Yuyang Wang

Tangyao Li, Yitong Zhu, Hai-Ning Liang et al.

As virtual reality (VR) systems advance, they are increasingly expected to adapt intelligently to individual users' states, abilities, and preferences. While prior research has examined user-state sensing and adaptive interaction design in VR, existing reviews typically address these aspects in isolation. In this paper, we examine the growing body of research on personalization in VR, with a particular focus on how user data collected during immersion is used to drive adaptive strategies that tailor the experience and enhance engagement, performance, or other specific goals. We synthesize findings from studies that employ adaptive techniques across diverse application domains and summarize a five-stage conceptual framework that unifies adaptive mechanisms across domains. Our analysis reveals emerging trends, including the integration of multimodal sensors, the transition from purely reactive to hybrid adaptation systems, and the adoption of artificial intelligence approaches. Finally, we identify key challenges related to data, modeling, and evaluation, and outline future research directions toward more effective and user-centered VR systems.

Rui Wang, Danielle Maddix, Christos Faloutsos et al.

How can we learn a dynamical system to make forecasts, when some variables are unobserved? For instance, in COVID-19, we want to forecast the number of infected and death cases but we do not know the count of susceptible and exposed people. While mechanics compartment models are widely used in epidemic modeling, data-driven models are emerging for disease forecasting. We first formalize the learning of physics-based models as AutoODE, which leverages automatic differentiation to estimate the model parameters. Through a benchmark study on COVID-19 forecasting, we notice that physics-based mechanistic models significantly outperform deep learning. Our method obtains a 57.4% reduction in mean absolute errors for 7-day ahead COVID-19 forecasting compared with the best deep learning competitor. Such performance differences highlight the generalization problem in dynamical system learning due to distribution shift. We identify two scenarios where distribution shift can occur: changes in data domain and changes in parameter domain (system dynamics). Through systematic experiments on several dynamical systems, we found that deep learning models fail to forecast well under both scenarios. While much research on distribution shift has focused on changes in the data domain, our work calls attention to rethink generalization for learning dynamical systems.