5.7CVOct 13, 2022
A Systematic Review of Machine Learning Techniques for Cattle Identification: Datasets, Methods and Future DirectionsMd Ekramul Hossain, Muhammad Ashad Kabir, Lihong Zheng et al.
Increased biosecurity and food safety requirements may increase demand for efficient traceability and identification systems of livestock in the supply chain. The advanced technologies of machine learning and computer vision have been applied in precision livestock management, including critical disease detection, vaccination, production management, tracking, and health monitoring. This paper offers a systematic literature review (SLR) of vision-based cattle identification. More specifically, this SLR is to identify and analyse the research related to cattle identification using Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL). For the two main applications of cattle detection and cattle identification, all the ML based papers only solve cattle identification problems. However, both detection and identification problems were studied in the DL based papers. Based on our survey report, the most used ML models for cattle identification were support vector machine (SVM), k-nearest neighbour (KNN), and artificial neural network (ANN). Convolutional neural network (CNN), residual network (ResNet), Inception, You Only Look Once (YOLO), and Faster R-CNN were popular DL models in the selected papers. Among these papers, the most distinguishing features were the muzzle prints and coat patterns of cattle. Local binary pattern (LBP), speeded up robust features (SURF), scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT), and Inception or CNN were identified as the most used feature extraction methods.
5.7CVOct 21, 2022
Automatic Cattle Identification using YOLOv5 and Mosaic Augmentation: A Comparative AnalysisRabin Dulal, Lihong Zheng, Muhammad Ashad Kabir et al.
You Only Look Once (YOLO) is a single-stage object detection model popular for real-time object detection, accuracy, and speed. This paper investigates the YOLOv5 model to identify cattle in the yards. The current solution to cattle identification includes radio-frequency identification (RFID) tags. The problem occurs when the RFID tag is lost or damaged. A biometric solution identifies the cattle and helps to assign the lost or damaged tag or replace the RFID-based system. Muzzle patterns in cattle are unique biometric solutions like a fingerprint in humans. This paper aims to present our recent research in utilizing five popular object detection models, looking at the architecture of YOLOv5, investigating the performance of eight backbones with the YOLOv5 model, and the influence of mosaic augmentation in YOLOv5 by experimental results on the available cattle muzzle images. Finally, we concluded with the excellent potential of using YOLOv5 in automatic cattle identification. Our experiments show YOLOv5 with transformer performed best with mean Average Precision (mAP) 0.5 (the average of AP when the IoU is greater than 50%) of 0.995, and mAP 0.5:0.95 (the average of AP from 50% to 95% IoU with an interval of 5%) of 0.9366. In addition, our experiments show the increase in accuracy of the model by using mosaic augmentation in all backbones used in our experiments. Moreover, we can also detect cattle with partial muzzle images.
9.4LGFeb 10, 2025
Learning-based estimation of cattle weight gain and its influencing factorsMuhammad Riaz Hasib Hossain, Rafiqul Islam, Shawn R. McGrath et al.
Many cattle farmers still depend on manual methods to measure the live weight gain of cattle at set intervals, which is time consuming, labour intensive, and stressful for both the animals and handlers. A remote and autonomous monitoring system using machine learning (ML) or deep learning (DL) can provide a more efficient and less invasive method and also predictive capabilities for future cattle weight gain (CWG). This system allows continuous monitoring and estimation of individual cattle live weight gain, growth rates and weight fluctuations considering various factors like environmental conditions, genetic predispositions, feed availability, movement patterns and behaviour. Several researchers have explored the efficiency of estimating CWG using ML and DL algorithms. However, estimating CWG suffers from a lack of consistency in its application. Moreover, ML or DL can provide weight gain estimations based on several features that vary in existing research. Additionally, previous studies have encountered various data related challenges when estimating CWG. This paper presents a comprehensive investigation in estimating CWG using advanced ML techniques based on research articles (between 2004 and 2024). This study investigates the current tools, methods, and features used in CWG estimation, as well as their strengths and weaknesses. The findings highlight the significance of using advanced ML approaches in CWG estimation and its critical influence on factors. Furthermore, this study identifies potential research gaps and provides research direction on CWG prediction, which serves as a reference for future research in this area.
3.3AISep 16, 2025
Mob-based cattle weight gain forecasting using ML modelsMuhammad Riaz Hasib Hossain, Rafiqul Islam, Shawn R McGrath et al.
Forecasting mob based cattle weight gain (MB CWG) may benefit large livestock farms, allowing farmers to refine their feeding strategies, make educated breeding choices, and reduce risks linked to climate variability and market fluctuations. In this paper, a novel technique termed MB CWG is proposed to forecast the one month advanced weight gain of herd based cattle using historical data collected from the Charles Sturt University Farm. This research employs a Random Forest (RF) model, comparing its performance against Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) models for monthly weight gain prediction. Four datasets were used to evaluate the performance of models, using 756 sample data from 108 herd-based cattle, along with weather data (rainfall and temperature) influencing CWG. The RF model performs better than the SVR and LSTM models across all datasets, achieving an R^2 of 0.973, RMSE of 0.040, and MAE of 0.033 when both weather and age factors were included. The results indicate that including both weather and age factors significantly improves the accuracy of weight gain predictions, with the RF model outperforming the SVR and LSTM models in all scenarios. These findings demonstrate the potential of RF as a robust tool for forecasting cattle weight gain in variable conditions, highlighting the influence of age and climatic factors on herd based weight trends. This study has also developed an innovative automated pre processing tool to generate a benchmark dataset for MB CWG predictive models. The tool is publicly available on GitHub and can assist in preparing datasets for current and future analytical research..