Benjamin Hong

Robin Linzmayer, Georgianna Lin, Di Coneybeare et al.

We introduce AcuityBench, a benchmark for evaluating whether language models identify the appropriate urgency of care from user medical presentations. Existing health benchmarks emphasize medical question answering, broad health interactions, or narrow workflow-specific triage tasks, but they do not offer a unified evaluation of acuity identification across these settings. AcuityBench addresses this gap by harmonizing five public datasets spanning user conversations, online forum posts, clinical vignettes, and patient portal messages under a shared four-level acuity framework ranging from home monitoring to immediate emergency care. The benchmark contains 914 cases, including 697 consensus cases for standard accuracy evaluation and 217 physician-confirmed ambiguous cases for uncertainty-aware evaluation. It supports two complementary task formats: explicit four-way classification in a QA setting, and free-form conversational responses evaluated with a rubric-based judge anchored to the same framework. Across 12 frontier proprietary and open-weight models, we find substantial variation in clear-case acuity accuracy and error direction. Comparing task formats reveals a systematic tradeoff: conversational responses reduce over-triage but increase under-triage relative to QA, especially in higher-acuity cases. In ambiguous cases, no model closely matches the distribution of physician judgments, and model predictions are more concentrated than expert clinical uncertainty. We also compare expert and model adjudication on a subset of maximally ambiguous cases, using those cases to examine the role of clinical uncertainty in label disagreement. Together, these results position acuity identification as a distinct safety-critical capability and show that AcuityBench enables systematic comparison and stress-testing of how well models guide users to the right level of care in real-world health use.

Adam Labiosa, Zhihan Wang, Siddhant Agarwal et al.

Robot decision-making in partially observable, real-time, dynamic, and multi-agent environments remains a difficult and unsolved challenge. Model-free reinforcement learning (RL) is a promising approach to learning decision-making in such domains, however, end-to-end RL in complex environments is often intractable. To address this challenge in the RoboCup Standard Platform League (SPL) domain, we developed a novel architecture integrating RL within a classical robotics stack, while employing a multi-fidelity sim2real approach and decomposing behavior into learned sub-behaviors with heuristic selection. Our architecture led to victory in the 2024 RoboCup SPL Challenge Shield Division. In this work, we fully describe our system's architecture and empirically analyze key design decisions that contributed to its success. Our approach demonstrates how RL-based behaviors can be integrated into complete robot behavior architectures.