Muhammad Fawad Akbar Khan

Muhammad Fawad Akbar Khan, Max Ramsdell, Erik Falor et al.

This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of the code generation capabilities of ChatGPT, a prominent large language model, compared to human programmers. A novel dataset of 131 code-generation prompts across 5 categories was curated to enable robust analysis. Code solutions were generated by both ChatGPT and humans for all prompts, resulting in 262 code samples. A meticulous manual assessment methodology prioritized evaluating correctness, comprehensibility, and security using 14 established code quality metrics. The key findings reveal ChatGPT's strengths in crafting concise, efficient code with advanced constructs, showcasing strengths in data analysis tasks (93.1% accuracy) but limitations in visual-graphical challenges. Comparative analysis with human code highlights ChatGPT's inclination towards modular design and superior error handling. Additionally, machine learning models effectively distinguished ChatGPT from human code with up to 88% accuracy, suggesting detectable coding style disparities. By providing profound insights into ChatGPT's code generation capabilities and limitations through quantitative metrics and qualitative analysis, this study makes valuable contributions toward advancing AI-based programming assistants. The curated dataset and methodology offer a robust foundation for future research in this nascent domain. All data and codes are available on https://github.com/DSAatUSU/ChatGPT-promises-and-pitfalls.

Soheila Farokhi, Aswani Yaramala, Jiangtao Huang et al.

In recent years, Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have gained significant traction as a rapidly growing phenomenon in online learning. Unlike traditional classrooms, MOOCs offer a unique opportunity to cater to a diverse audience from different backgrounds and geographical locations. Renowned universities and MOOC-specific providers, such as Coursera, offer MOOC courses on various subjects. Automated assessment tasks like grade and early dropout predictions are necessary due to the high enrollment and limited direct interaction between teachers and learners. However, current automated assessment approaches overlook the structural links between different entities involved in the downstream tasks, such as the students and courses. Our hypothesis suggests that these structural relationships, manifested through an interaction graph, contain valuable information that can enhance the performance of the task at hand. To validate this, we construct a unique knowledge graph for a large MOOC dataset, which will be publicly available to the research community. Furthermore, we utilize graph embedding techniques to extract latent structural information encoded in the interactions between entities in the dataset. These techniques do not require ground truth labels and can be utilized for various tasks. Finally, by combining entity-specific features, behavioral features, and extracted structural features, we enhance the performance of predictive machine learning models in student assignment grade prediction. Our experiments demonstrate that structural features can significantly improve the predictive performance of downstream assessment tasks. The code and data are available in \url{https://github.com/DSAatUSU/MOOPer_grade_prediction}