Pan Chen

Ilya Musabirov, Angela Zavaleta-Bernuy, Pan Chen et al.

Randomized A/B comparisons of alternative pedagogical strategies or other course improvements could provide useful empirical evidence for instructor decision-making. However, traditional experiments do not provide a straightforward pathway to rapidly utilize data, increasing the chances that students in an experiment experience the best conditions. Drawing inspiration from the use of machine learning and experimentation in product development at leading technology companies, we explore how adaptive experimentation might aid continuous course improvement. In adaptive experiments, data is analyzed and utilized as different conditions are deployed to students. This can be achieved using machine learning algorithms to identify which actions are more beneficial in improving students' learning experiences and outcomes. These algorithms can then dynamically deploy the most effective conditions in subsequent interactions with students, resulting in better support for students' needs. We illustrate this approach with a case study that provides a side-by-side comparison of traditional and adaptive experiments on adding self-explanation prompts in online homework problems in a CS1 course. This work paves the way for exploring the importance of adaptive experiments in bridging research and practice to achieve continuous improvement in educational settings.

Ananya Bhattacharjee, Pan Chen, Linjia Zhou et al.

We investigate users' perspectives on an online reflective question activity (RQA) that prompts people to externalize their underlying emotions on a troubling situation. Inspired by principles of cognitive behavioral therapy, our 15-minute activity encourages self-reflection without a human or automated conversational partner. A deployment of our RQA on Amazon Mechanical Turk suggests that people perceive several benefits from our RQA, including structured awareness of their thoughts and problem-solving around managing their emotions. Quantitative evidence from a randomized experiment suggests people find that our RQA makes them feel less worried by their selected situation and worth the minimal time investment. A further two-week technology probe deployment with 11 participants indicates that people see benefits to doing this activity repeatedly, although the activity may get monotonous over time. In summary, this work demonstrates the promise of online reflection activities that carefully leverage principles of psychology in their design.

Nayan Saxena, Pan Chen, Emmy Liu

Multi-Armed-Bandit frameworks have often been used by researchers to assess educational interventions, however, recent work has shown that it is more beneficial for a student to provide qualitative feedback through preference elicitation between different alternatives, making a dueling bandits framework more appropriate. In this paper, we explore the statistical quality of data under this framework by comparing traditional uniform sampling to a dueling bandit algorithm and find that dueling bandit algorithms perform well at cumulative regret minimisation, but lead to inflated Type-I error rates and reduced power under certain circumstances. Through these results we provide insight into the challenges and opportunities in using dueling bandit algorithms to run adaptive experiments.