Lin Chen

Yang Lu, Lin Chen, Yonggang Zhang et al.

Federated learning (FL) has shown remarkable success in cooperatively training deep models, while typically struggling with noisy labels. Advanced works propose to tackle label noise by a re-weighting strategy with a strong assumption, i.e., mild label noise. However, it may be violated in many real-world FL scenarios because of highly contaminated clients, resulting in extreme noise ratios, e.g., $>$90%. To tackle extremely noisy clients, we study the robustness of the re-weighting strategy, showing a pessimistic conclusion: minimizing the weight of clients trained over noisy data outperforms re-weighting strategies. To leverage models trained on noisy clients, we propose a novel approach, called negative distillation (FedNed). FedNed first identifies noisy clients and employs rather than discards the noisy clients in a knowledge distillation manner. In particular, clients identified as noisy ones are required to train models using noisy labels and pseudo-labels obtained by global models. The model trained on noisy labels serves as a `bad teacher' in knowledge distillation, aiming to decrease the risk of providing incorrect information. Meanwhile, the model trained on pseudo-labels is involved in model aggregation if not identified as a noisy client. Consequently, through pseudo-labeling, FedNed gradually increases the trustworthiness of models trained on noisy clients, while leveraging all clients for model aggregation through negative distillation. To verify the efficacy of FedNed, we conduct extensive experiments under various settings, demonstrating that FedNed can consistently outperform baselines and achieve state-of-the-art performance. Our code is available at https://github.com/linChen99/FedNed.

Chenghua Gao, Min Li, Jianshuo Liu et al.

Video Moment Retrieval (VMR) aims to retrieve relevant moments of an untrimmed video corresponding to the query. While cross-modal interaction approaches have shown progress in filtering out query-irrelevant information in videos, they assume the precise alignment between the query semantics and the corresponding video moments, potentially overlooking the misunderstanding of the natural language semantics. To address this challenge, we propose a novel model called \textit{QD-VMR}, a query debiasing model with enhanced contextual understanding. Firstly, we leverage a Global Partial Aligner module via video clip and query features alignment and video-query contrastive learning to enhance the cross-modal understanding capabilities of the model. Subsequently, we employ a Query Debiasing Module to obtain debiased query features efficiently, and a Visual Enhancement module to refine the video features related to the query. Finally, we adopt the DETR structure to predict the possible target video moments. Through extensive evaluations of three benchmark datasets, QD-VMR achieves state-of-the-art performance, proving its potential to improve the accuracy of VMR. Further analytical experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed module. Our code will be released to facilitate future research.

Shiran Liu, Zhaoqiang Guo, Yanhui Li et al.

Code documentations are essential for software quality assurance, but due to time or economic pressures, code developers are often unable to write documents for all modules in a project. Recently, a supervised artificial neural network (ANN) approach is proposed to prioritize important modules for documentation effort. However, as a supervised approach, there is a need to use labeled training data to train the prediction model, which may not be easy to obtain in practice. Furthermore, it is unclear whether the ANN approach is generalizable, as it is only evaluated on several small data sets. In this paper, we propose an unsupervised approach based on PageRank to prioritize documentation effort. This approach identifies "important" modules only based on the dependence relationships between modules in a project. As a result, the PageRank approach does not need any training data to build the prediction model. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the PageRank approach, we use six additional large data sets to conduct the experiments in addition to the same data sets collected from open-source projects as used in prior studies. The experimental results show that the PageRank approach is superior to the state-of-the-art ANN approach in prioritizing important modules for documentation effort. In particular, due to the simplicity and effectiveness, we advocate that the PageRank approach should be used as an easy-to-implement baseline in future research on documentation effort prioritization, and any new approach should be compared with it to demonstrate its effectiveness.

Zhaoqiang Guo, Shiran Liu, Jinping Liu et al.

In the process of software evolution, developers often sacrifice the long-term code quality to satisfy the short-term goals due to specific reasons, which is called technical debt. In particular, self-admitted technical debt (SATD) refers to those that were intentionally introduced and remarked by code comments. Those technical debts reduce the quality of software and increase the cost of subsequent software maintenance. Therefore, it is necessary to find out and resolve these debts in time. Recently, many approaches have been proposed to identify SATD. However, those approaches either have a low accuracy or are complex to implementation in practice. In this paper, we propose a simple unsupervised baseline approach that fuzzily matches task annotation tags (MAT) to identify SATD. MAT does not need any training data to build a prediction model. Instead, MAT only examines whether any of four task tags (i.e. TODO, FIXME, XXX, and HACK) appears in the comments of a target project to identify SATD. In this sense, MAT is a natural baseline approach, which has a good understandability, in SATD identification. In order to evaluate the usefulness of MAT, we use 10 open-source projects to conduct the experiment. The experimental results reveal that MAT has a surprisingly excellent performance for SATD identification compared with the state-of-the-art approaches. As such, we suggest that, in the future SATD identification studies, MAT should be considered as an easy-to-implement baseline to which any new approach should be compared against to demonstrate its usefulness.

Linghan Meng, Yanhui Li, Lin Chen et al.

The boom of DL technology leads to massive DL models built and shared, which facilitates the acquisition and reuse of DL models. For a given task, we encounter multiple DL models available with the same functionality, which are considered as candidates to achieve this task. Testers are expected to compare multiple DL models and select the more suitable ones w.r.t. the whole testing context. Due to the limitation of labeling effort, testers aim to select an efficient subset of samples to make an as precise rank estimation as possible for these models. To tackle this problem, we propose Sample Discrimination based Selection (SDS) to select efficient samples that could discriminate multiple models, i.e., the prediction behaviors (right/wrong) of these samples would be helpful to indicate the trend of model performance. To evaluate SDS, we conduct an extensive empirical study with three widely-used image datasets and 80 real world DL models. The experimental results show that, compared with state-of-the-art baseline methods, SDS is an effective and efficient sample selection method to rank multiple DL models.

Shiran Liu, Zhaoqiang Guo, Yanhui Li et al.

The label quality of defect data sets has a direct influence on the reliability of defect prediction models. In this study, for multi-version-project defect data sets, we propose an approach to automatically detecting instances with inconsistent labels (i.e. the phenomena of instances having the same source code but different labels over multiple versions of a software project) and understand their influence on the evaluation and interpretation of defect prediction models. Based on five multi-version-project defect data sets (either widely used or the most up-to-date in the literature) collected by diverse approaches, we find that: (1) most versions in the investigated defect data sets contain inconsistent labels with varying degrees; (2) the existence of inconsistent labels in a training data set may considerably change the prediction performance of a defect prediction model as well as can lead to the identification of substantially different true defective modules; and (3) the importance ranking of independent variables in a defect prediction model can be substantially shifted due to the existence of inconsistent labels. The above findings reveal that inconsistent labels in defect data sets can profoundly change the prediction ability and interpretation of a defect prediction model. Therefore, we strongly suggest that practitioners should detect and exclude inconsistent labels in defect data sets to avoid their potential negative influence on defect prediction models. What is more, it is necessary for researchers to improve existing defect label collection approaches to reduce inconsistent labels. Furthermore, there is a need to re-examine the experimental conclusions of previous studies using multi-version-project defect data sets with a high ratio of inconsistent labels.