Yuxi Huang

Zhaonan Li, Kyle R. Chickering, Bangzheng Li et al.

A useful test of visual concept learning is not just whether a model can recognize a concept in a single image, but whether it can preserve and manipulate concept-level properties under transformation and transfer them to new scenes. We introduce VisAnalog, a controlled suite for this setting on natural images. Each example instantiates $A\!:\!B::C\!:\,?$: images $B$ and a hidden target image $D$ are produced by applying the same deterministic transformation sequence to source images $A$ and $C$. Given $A$, $B$, and $C$, a model must answer a multiple-choice question about $D$. The benchmark contains 617 human-validated questions spanning one- to four-step transformations such as zoom, quadrant swap, rotation, flip, and hue rotation. Across strong proprietary and open-source VLMs, end-to-end accuracy is substantially lower than oracle accuracy when $D$ is directly shown, and degrades sharply as transformation depth increases, while human performance remains near the ceiling. A program-conditioned evaluation further separates failures of relation inference from failures of transformation application, showing that inferring the visual relation from $A \rightarrow B$ is the dominant bottleneck, with additional application errors emerging on harder multi-step cases. The dataset is publicly available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/zli99/VisAnalog.

Huandong Wang, Wenjie Fu, Yingzhou Tang et al.

While large language models (LLMs) present significant potential for supporting numerous real-world applications and delivering positive social impacts, they still face significant challenges in terms of the inherent risk of privacy leakage, hallucinated outputs, and value misalignment, and can be maliciously used for generating toxic content and unethical purposes after been jailbroken. Therefore, in this survey, we present a comprehensive review of recent advancements aimed at mitigating these issues, organized across the four phases of LLM development and usage: data collecting and pre-training, fine-tuning and alignment, prompting and reasoning, and post-processing and auditing. We elaborate on the recent advances for enhancing the performance of LLMs in terms of privacy protection, hallucination reduction, value alignment, toxicity elimination, and jailbreak defenses. In contrast to previous surveys that focus on a single dimension of responsible LLMs, this survey presents a unified framework that encompasses these diverse dimensions, providing a comprehensive view of enhancing LLMs to better serve real-world applications.

Xiao Ye, Jacob Dineen, Zhaonan Li et al.

Medical Large language models achieve strong scores on standard benchmarks; however, the transfer of those results to safe and reliable performance in clinical workflows remains a challenge. This survey reframes evaluation through a levels-of-autonomy lens (L0-L3), spanning informational tools, information transformation and aggregation, decision support, and supervised agents. We align existing benchmarks and metrics with the actions permitted at each level and their associated risks, making the evaluation targets explicit. This motivates a level-conditioned blueprint for selecting metrics, assembling evidence, and reporting claims, alongside directions that link evaluation to oversight. By centering autonomy, the survey moves the field beyond score-based claims toward credible, risk-aware evidence for real clinical use.

Qin Liu, Jacob Dineen, Yuxi Huang et al. · microsoft-research

Benchmarks are central to measuring the capabilities of large language models and guiding model development, yet widespread data leakage from pretraining corpora undermines their validity. Models can match memorized content rather than demonstrate true generalization, which inflates scores, distorts cross-model comparisons, and misrepresents progress. We introduce ArenaBencher, a model-agnostic framework for automatic benchmark evolution that updates test cases while preserving comparability. Given an existing benchmark and a diverse pool of models to be evaluated, ArenaBencher infers the core ability of each test case, generates candidate question-answer pairs that preserve the original objective, verifies correctness and intent with an LLM as a judge, and aggregates feedback from multiple models to select candidates that expose shared weaknesses. The process runs iteratively with in-context demonstrations that steer generation toward more challenging and diagnostic cases. We apply ArenaBencher to math problem solving, commonsense reasoning, and safety domains and show that it produces verified, diverse, and fair updates that uncover new failure modes, increase difficulty while preserving test objective alignment, and improve model separability. The framework provides a scalable path to continuously evolve benchmarks in step with the rapid progress of foundation models.