Chao Zhang

Wensheng Li, Hao Wang, Ruifeng Zhou et al.

Curriculum learning (CL) is referred to as a training strategy that makes easy samples learned first and then fits hard samples. It imitates the process of humans learning knowledge, and has become a potential manner of effectively training deep networks. In this study, we develop the adaptively point-weighting (APW) curriculum learning algorithm, which adaptively assigns the weight to every training sample not only based on its training error but also considering the current training state of the network. Specifically, in the early training phase, it increases the weights of easy samples to make the network rapidly capture the overall characteristics of the dataset; and in the later training phase, the weights of hard points rise to improve the fitting performance on the discrete local regions. Moreover, we also present the theoretical analysis on the properties of APW including training effectiveness, training feasibility, training stability, and generalization performance. The numerical experiments support the superiority of APW and demonstrate the validity of our theoretical findings.

Yuan Li, Wende Tan, Zhizheng Lv et al.

Memory safety is a key security property that stops memory corruption vulnerabilities. Existing sanitizers enforce checks and catch such bugs during development and testing. However, they either provide partial memory safety or have overwhelmingly high performance overheads. Our novel sanitizer PACSan enforces spatial and temporal memory safety with no false positives at low performance overheads. PACSan removes the majority of the overheads involved in pointer tracking by sealing metadata in pointers through ARM PA (Pointer Authentication), and performing the memory safety checks when pointers are dereferenced. We have developed a prototype of PACSan and systematically evaluated its security and performance on the Magma, Juliet, Nginx, and SPEC CPU2017 test suites, respectively. In our evaluation, PACSan shows no false positives together with negligible false negatives, while introducing stronger security guarantees and lower performance overheads than state-of-the-art sanitizers, including HWASan, ASan, SoftBound+CETS, Memcheck, LowFat, and PTAuth. Specifically, PACSan has 0.84x runtime overhead and 1.92x memory overhead on average. Compared to the widely deployed ASan, PACSan has no false positives and much fewer false negatives and reduces 7.172% runtime overheads and 89.063%memory overheads.