Nikolaos Laoutaris

Tianyue Chu, Mengwei Yang, Nikolaos Laoutaris et al.

Federated learning (FL) is a paradigm that allows several client devices and a server to collaboratively train a global model, by exchanging only model updates, without the devices sharing their local training data. These devices are often constrained in terms of communication and computation resources, and can further benefit from model pruning -- a paradigm that is widely used to reduce the size and complexity of models. Intuitively, by making local models coarser, pruning is expected to also provide some protection against privacy attacks in the context of FL. However this protection has not been previously characterized, formally or experimentally, and it is unclear if it is sufficient against state-of-the-art attacks. In this paper, we perform the first investigation of privacy guarantees for model pruning in FL. We derive information-theoretic upper bounds on the amount of information leaked by pruned FL models. We complement and validate these theoretical findings, with comprehensive experiments that involve state-of-the-art privacy attacks, on several state-of-the-art FL pruning schemes, using benchmark datasets. This evaluation provides valuable insights into the choices and parameters that can affect the privacy protection provided by pruning. Based on these insights, we introduce PriPrune -- a privacy-aware algorithm for local model pruning, which uses a personalized per-client defense mask and adapts the defense pruning rate so as to jointly optimize privacy and model performance. PriPrune is universal in that can be applied after any pruned FL scheme on the client, without modification, and protects against any inversion attack by the server. Our empirical evaluation demonstrates that PriPrune significantly improves the privacy-accuracy tradeoff compared to state-of-the-art pruned FL schemes that do not take privacy into account.

Naicheng Li, Javad Dogani, Rui Wang et al.

Traditional federated learning (FL) relies on a central aggregator server, which can create performance bottlenecks and privacy risks. Decentralized mix-and-forward designs remove the server, but repeated local mixing can attenuate global information under heterogeneity and exposes peer-to-peer neighborhoods as a privacy attack surface. To preserve FedAvg-style aggregation semantics (over updates reconstructable by the round deadline) while scaling dissemination, we present FLTorrent, a BitTorrent-based dissemination layer for serverless FL with a short warm-up. Warm-up hardens within-round source unlinkability -- a dissemination-layer goal orthogonal to content protections (e.g., DP or secure aggregation) -- via (i) pre-round obfuscation, (ii) randomized lags, and (iii) coordination-only non-owner-first scheduling (tracker off the data path), before switching to vanilla BitTorrent swarming. We upper-bound the per-transfer attribution posterior by the fraction of owner chunks in a sender's eligible cover set, and derive a tighter high-probability bound that improves with early non-owner mass. A simple heuristic, GreedyFastestFirst, attains approximately 92% of a bandwidth-optimal max-flow upper bound, while warm-up remains a stable approximately 12% share of a round across 100--500 peers. Under an observation-only local adversary, FLTorrent drives attribution success close to neighborhood-level random guessing for typical nodes, improves with network size, and remains robust under collusion. In LLM-scale stress tests (Gemma-7B, DeepSeek-R1-14B, Qwen2.5-32B, and Llama-3.3-70B) over 7--10 Gbps access links, FLTorrent adds only approximately 6--10% end-to-end overhead relative to BitTorrent-only. Overall, FLTorrent shows that within-round unlinkability and BitTorrent-level efficiency can co-exist with predictable, low overheads at scale.

Devriş İşler, Elina van Kempen, Seoyeon Hwang et al.

Federated learning (FL) offers privacy preserving, distributed machine learning, allowing clients to contribute to a global model without revealing their local data. As models increasingly serve as monetizable digital assets, the ability to prove participation in their training becomes essential for establishing ownership. In this paper, we address this emerging need by introducing FedPoP, a novel FL framework that allows nonlinkable proof of participation while preserving client anonymity and privacy without requiring either extensive computations or a public ledger. FedPoP is designed to seamlessly integrate with existing secure aggregation protocols to ensure compatibility with real-world FL deployments. We provide a proof of concept implementation and an empirical evaluation under realistic client dropouts. In our prototype, FedPoP introduces 0.97 seconds of per-round overhead atop securely aggregated FL and enables a client to prove its participation/contribution to a model held by a third party in 0.0612 seconds. These results indicate FedPoP is practical for real-world deployments that require auditable participation without sacrificing privacy.

Tianyue Chu, Nikolaos Laoutaris

Federated Learning (FL) permits different parties to collaboratively train a global model without disclosing their respective local labels. A crucial step of FL, that of aggregating local models to produce the global one, shares many similarities with public decision-making, and elections in particular. In that context, a major weakness of FL, namely its vulnerability to poisoning attacks, can be interpreted as a consequence of the one person one vote (henceforth 1p1v) principle underpinning most contemporary aggregation rules. In this paper, we propose FedQV, a novel aggregation algorithm built upon the quadratic voting scheme, recently proposed as a better alternative to 1p1v-based elections. Our theoretical analysis establishes that FedQV is a truthful mechanism in which bidding according to one's true valuation is a dominant strategy that achieves a convergence rate that matches those of state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, our empirical analysis using multiple real-world datasets validates the superior performance of FedQV against poisoning attacks. It also shows that combining FedQV with unequal voting ``budgets'' according to a reputation score increases its performance benefits even further. Finally, we show that FedQV can be easily combined with Byzantine-robust privacy-preserving mechanisms to enhance its robustness against both poisoning and privacy attacks.

Tianyue Chu, Alvaro Garcia-Recuero, Costas Iordanou et al.

We present a Federated Learning (FL) based solution for building a distributed classifier capable of detecting URLs containing GDPR-sensitive content related to categories such as health, sexual preference, political beliefs, etc. Although such a classifier addresses the limitations of previous offline/centralised classifiers,it is still vulnerable to poisoning attacks from malicious users that may attempt to reduce the accuracy for benign users by disseminating faulty model updates. To guard against this, we develop a robust aggregation scheme based on subjective logic and residual-based attack detection. Employing a combination of theoretical analysis, trace-driven simulation, as well as experimental validation with a prototype and real users, we show that our classifier can detect sensitive content with high accuracy, learn new labels fast, and remain robust in view of poisoning attacks from malicious users, as well as imperfect input from non-malicious ones.

Costas Iordanou, Georgios Smaragdakis, Nikolaos Laoutaris

We turn our attention to the elephant in the room of data protection, which is none other than the simple and obvious question: "Who's tracking sensitive domains?". Despite a fast-growing amount of work on more complex facets of the interplay between privacy and the business models of the Web, the obvious question of who collects data on domains where most people would prefer not be seen, has received rather limited attention. First, we develop a methodology for automatically annotating websites that belong to a sensitive category, e.g. as defined by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Then, we extract the third party tracking services included directly, or via recursive inclusions, by the above mentioned sites. Having analyzed around 30k sensitive domains, we show that such domains are tracked, albeit less intensely than the mainstream ones. Looking in detail at the tracking services operating on them, we find well known names, as well as some less known ones, including some specializing on specific sensitive categories.

Michalis Pachilakis, Panagiotis Papadopoulos, Nikolaos Laoutaris et al.

The Real Time Bidding (RTB) protocol is by now more than a decade old. During this time, a handful of measurement papers have looked at bidding strategies, personal information flow, and cost of display advertising through RTB. In this paper, we present YourAdvalue, a privacy-preserving tool for displaying to end-users in a simple and intuitive manner their advertising value as seen through RTB. Using YourAdvalue, we measure desktop RTB prices in the wild, and compare them with desktop and mobile RTB prices reported by past work. We present how it estimates ad prices that are encrypted, and how it preserves user privacy while reporting results back to a data-server for analysis. We deployed our system, disseminated its browser extension, and collected data from 200 users, including 12000 ad impressions over 11 months. By analyzing this dataset, we show that desktop RTB prices have grown 4.6X over desktop RTB prices measured in 2013, and 3.8X over mobile RTB prices measured in 2015. We also study how user demographics associate with the intensity of RTB ecosystem tracking, leading to higher ad prices. We find that exchanging data between advertisers and/or data brokers through cookie-synchronization increases the median value of displayed ads by 19%. We also find that female and younger users are more targeted, suffering more tracking (via cookie synchronization) than male or elder users. As a result of this targeting in our dataset, the advertising value (i) of women is 2.4X higher than that of men, (ii) of 25-34 year-olds is 2.5X higher than that of 35-44 year-olds, (iii) is most expensive on weekends and early mornings.

Panagiotis Papadopoulos, Nicolas Kourtellis, Pablo Rodriguez Rodriguez et al.

Online advertising is progressively moving towards a programmatic model in which ads are matched to actual interests of individuals collected as they browse the web. Letting the huge debate around privacy aside, a very important question in this area, for which little is known, is: How much do advertisers pay to reach an individual? In this study, we develop a first of its kind methodology for computing exactly that -- the price paid for a web user by the ad ecosystem -- and we do that in real time. Our approach is based on tapping on the Real Time Bidding (RTB) protocol to collect cleartext and encrypted prices for winning bids paid by advertisers in order to place targeted ads. Our main technical contribution is a method for tallying winning bids even when they are encrypted. We achieve this by training a model using as ground truth prices obtained by running our own "probe" ad-campaigns. We design our methodology through a browser extension and a back-end server that provides it with fresh models for encrypted bids. We validate our methodology using a one year long trace of 1600 mobile users and demonstrate that it can estimate a user's advertising worth with more than 82% accuracy.