Vaibhav Singh

LG
h-index17
4papers
20citations
Novelty43%
AI Score31

4 Papers

3.9HCMar 1, 2023
A prototype hybrid prediction market for estimating replicability of published work

Tatiana Chakravorti, Robert Fraleigh, Timothy Fritton et al.

We present a prototype hybrid prediction market and demonstrate the avenue it represents for meaningful human-AI collaboration. We build on prior work proposing artificial prediction markets as a novel machine-learning algorithm. In an artificial prediction market, trained AI agents buy and sell outcomes of future events. Classification decisions can be framed as outcomes of future events, and accordingly, the price of an asset corresponding to a given classification outcome can be taken as a proxy for the confidence of the system in that decision. By embedding human participants in these markets alongside bot traders, we can bring together insights from both. In this paper, we detail pilot studies with prototype hybrid markets for the prediction of replication study outcomes. We highlight challenges and opportunities, share insights from semi-structured interviews with hybrid market participants, and outline a vision for ongoing and future work.

15.7LGMar 4, 2025
Beyond Cosine Decay: On the effectiveness of Infinite Learning Rate Schedule for Continual Pre-training

Vaibhav Singh, Paul Janson, Paria Mehrbod et al.

The ever-growing availability of unlabeled data presents both opportunities and challenges for training artificial intelligence systems. While self-supervised learning (SSL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for extracting meaningful representations from vast amounts of unlabeled data, existing methods still struggle to adapt to the non-stationary, non-IID nature of real-world data streams without forgetting previously learned knowledge. Recent works have adopted a repeated cosine annealing schedule for large-scale continual pre-training; however, these schedules (1) inherently cause forgetting during the re-warming phase and (2) have not been systematically compared to existing continual SSL methods. In this work, we systematically compare the widely used cosine schedule with the recently proposed infinite learning rate schedule and empirically find the latter to be a more effective alternative. Our extensive empirical evaluation across diverse image and language datasets demonstrates that the infinite learning rate schedule consistently enhances continual pre-training performance compared to a repeated cosine decay without being restricted to a fixed iteration budget. For instance, in a small-scale MAE pre-training setup, it outperforms several strong baselines from the literature. We then scale up our experiments to larger MAE pre-training and autoregressive language model pre-training. Our results show that the infinite learning rate schedule remains effective at scale, surpassing repeated cosine decay for both MAE pre-training and zero-shot LM benchmarks.

11.4LGJul 11, 2025
Model Parallelism With Subnetwork Data Parallelism

Vaibhav Singh, Zafir Khalid, Edouard Oyallon et al.

Pre-training large neural networks at scale imposes heavy memory demands on accelerators and often requires costly communication. We introduce Subnetwork Data Parallelism (SDP), a distributed training framework that partitions a model into structured subnetworks trained across workers without exchanging activations. We study two complementary masking regimes: backward masking, which applies sparsity only in the backward step to retain unbiased gradients, and forward masking, which also removes parameters in the forward pass to deliver stronger efficiency gains while providing additional regularization. We further explore two subnetwork construction strategies: neuron level and block level, applied across both CNNs and transformers. In experiments spanning CNNs and transformers on CIFAR and ImageNet, as well as LLM pre-training on FineWeb, SDP reduces per-device memory usage by 30%-75% while maintaining or improving performance. Notably, in FLOP-matched settings, forward masking can sometimes achieve better performance.

10.4LGJun 19, 2024
Dual-Phase Continual Learning: Supervised Adaptation Meets Unsupervised Retention

Vaibhav Singh, Rahaf Aljundi, Eugene Belilovsky

Foundational Vision-Language Models (VLMs) excel across diverse tasks, but adapting them to new domains without forgetting prior knowledge remains a critical challenge. Continual Learning (CL) addresses this challenge by enabling models to learn sequentially from new data while mitigating the forgetting of prior information, typically under supervised settings involving label shift. Nonetheless, abrupt distribution shifts can still cause substantial forgetting, potentially nullifying the benefits of supervised updates, especially when storing or replaying past data is infeasible. In this work, we propose leveraging unlabeled testtime data in an unsupervised manner to reinforce prior task performance without requiring replay or stored examples. Unlike traditional Test Time Adaptation (TTA), which primarily focuses on domain shift or corruption, our method improves performance on earlier tasks by exploiting representative test samples encountered during deployment. We introduce a simple Teacher-Student framework with gradient-based sparse parameter updates, and show that it effectively mitigates forgetting in class-incremental CL for VLMs, offering a memory-free alternative to episodic replay with strong empirical results.