Chong Wu

Jiangbin Zheng, Siyuan Li, Cheng Tan et al.

Sign Language (SL), as the mother tongue of the deaf community, is a special visual language that most hearing people cannot understand. In recent years, neural Sign Language Translation (SLT), as a possible way for bridging communication gap between the deaf and the hearing people, has attracted widespread academic attention. We found that the current mainstream end-to-end neural SLT models, which tries to learning language knowledge in a weakly supervised manner, could not mine enough semantic information under the condition of low data resources. Therefore, we propose to introduce additional word-level semantic knowledge of sign language linguistics to assist in improving current end-to-end neural SLT models. Concretely, we propose a novel neural SLT model with multi-modal feature fusion based on the dynamic graph, in which the cross-modal information, i.e. text and video, is first assembled as a dynamic graph according to their correlation, and then the graph is processed by a multi-modal graph encoder to generate the multi-modal embeddings for further usage in the subsequent neural translation models. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to introduce graph neural networks, for fusing multi-modal information, into neural sign language translation models. Moreover, we conducted experiments on a publicly available popular SLT dataset RWTH-PHOENIX-Weather-2014T. and the quantitative experiments show that our method can improve the model.

Yichi Zhang, Fangzheng Xie, Shu Yang et al.

In language tasks that require extensive human--model interaction, deploying a single "best" model for every query can be expensive. To reduce inference cost while preserving the quality of the responses, a large language model (LLM) router selects the most appropriate model from a pool of candidates for each query. A central challenge to training a high-quality router is the scarcity of reliable supervision. Gold-standard data (e.g., expert-verified labels or rubric-based scores) provide accurate quality evaluations of LLM responses but are costly and difficult to scale. In contrast, preference-based data, collected via crowdsourcing or LLM-as-a-judge systems, are cheaper and more scalable, yet often biased in reflecting the true quality of responses. We cast the problem of LLM router training with combined gold-standard and preference-based data into a causal inference framework by viewing the response evaluation mechanism as the treatment assignment. This perspective further reveals that the bias in preference-based data corresponds to the well-known causal estimand: the conditional average treatment effect. Based on this new perspective, we develop an integrative causal router training framework that corrects preference-data bias, address imbalances between two data sources, and improve routing robustness and efficiency. Numerical experiments demonstrate that our approach delivers more accurate routing and improves the trade-off between cost and quality.