Siddharth Jain

Priyam Srivastava, Akshat R. Sabavat, Siddharth Jain et al.

Connection-less, packet-switched quantum network architectures distribute entanglement across multi-hop paths through sequential entanglement swapping, in which each node acts on purely local state information. The architectural advantages over the connection-oriented alternative -- simultaneous SWAP-ASAP -- are compelling, but sequential swapping holds partial chains in intermediate buffers between successive swaps, exposing them to memory decoherence in a way simultaneous SWAP-ASAP avoids by design. We present a proof-of-principle study at fixed chain length $n = 4$ in which each elementary link is governed by a fixed reinforcement-learning policy optimizing the secret-key rate of the six-state protocol, leaving the network-layer protocol as the sole independent variable. Sweeping the network-layer memory coherence time $T_c^{\mathrm{ext}}$ over four orders of magnitude reveals a clear regime structure governed by the dimensionless ratio $T_c^{\mathrm{ext}}/τ$, where $τ$ is the per-link entanglement heralding latency. Simultaneous SWAP-ASAP delivers a constant rate across the full sweep. Sequential swapping, by contrast, collapses to zero end-to-end deliveries below $T_c^{\mathrm{ext}}/τ= 25$, and begins recovering at $T_c^{\mathrm{ext}}/τ= 50$. It remains limited by the simultaneous rate, which it saturates only at the relaxed end of the sweep. These results suggest that the connection-less penalty is a near-term phenomenon tied to present-day memory coherence rather than a fundamental property of sequential swapping.

Bijan Mazaheri, Siddharth Jain, Matthew Cook et al.

We explore "omitted label contexts," in which training data is limited to a subset of the possible labels. This setting is standard among specialized human experts or specific, focused studies. By studying Simpson's paradox, we observe that ``correct'' adjustments sometimes require non-exchangeable treatment and control groups. A generalization of Simpson's paradox leads us to study networks of conclusions drawn from different contexts, within which a paradox of nontransitivity arises. We prove that the space of possible nontransitive structures in these networks exactly corresponds to structures that form from aggregating ranked-choice votes.

Bijan Mazaheri, Siddharth Jain, Jehoshua Bruck

Consider multiple experts with overlapping expertise working on a classification problem under uncertain input. What constitutes a consistent set of opinions? How can we predict the opinions of experts on missing sub-domains? In this paper, we define a framework of to analyze this problem, termed "expert graphs." In an expert graph, vertices represent classes and edges represent binary opinions on the topics of their vertices. We derive necessary conditions for expert graph validity and use them to create "synthetic experts" which describe opinions consistent with the observed opinions of other experts. We show this framework to be equivalent to the well-studied linear ordering polytope. We show our conditions are not sufficient for describing all expert graphs on cliques, but are sufficient for cycles.

Bijan Mazaheri, Siddharth Jain, Jehoshua Bruck

Varying domains and biased datasets can lead to differences between the training and the target distributions, known as covariate shift. Current approaches for alleviating this often rely on estimating the ratio of training and target probability density functions. These techniques require parameter tuning and can be unstable across different datasets. We present a new method for handling covariate shift using the empirical cumulative distribution function estimates of the target distribution by a rigorous generalization of a recent idea proposed by Vapnik and Izmailov. Further, we show experimentally that our method is more robust in its predictions, is not reliant on parameter tuning and shows similar classification performance compared to the current state-of-the-art techniques on synthetic and real datasets.

Netanel Raviv, Siddharth Jain, Pulakesh Upadhyaya et al.

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) are a revolutionary force in the ongoing information revolution, and yet their intrinsic properties remain a mystery. In particular, it is widely known that DNNs are highly sensitive to noise, whether adversarial or random. This poses a fundamental challenge for hardware implementations of DNNs, and for their deployment in critical applications such as autonomous driving. In this paper we construct robust DNNs via error correcting codes. By our approach, either the data or internal layers of the DNN are coded with error correcting codes, and successful computation under noise is guaranteed. Since DNNs can be seen as a layered concatenation of classification tasks, our research begins with the core task of classifying noisy coded inputs, and progresses towards robust DNNs. We focus on binary data and linear codes. Our main result is that the prevalent parity code can guarantee robustness for a large family of DNNs, which includes the recently popularized binarized neural networks. Further, we show that the coded classification problem has a deep connection to Fourier analysis of Boolean functions. In contrast to existing solutions in the literature, our results do not rely on altering the training process of the DNN, and provide mathematically rigorous guarantees rather than experimental evidence.