Zeng Wang

Weimin Fu, Zeng Wang, Minghao Shao et al.

Edge applications increasingly demand custom hardware, yet Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) design requires expertise that domain engineers lack. Large Language Models (LLMs) promise to bridge this gap through zero-knowledge hardware programming, where users describe circuits in natural language and an LLM compiles them to a hardware intermediate representation (IR) targeting silicon. Modeling this flow as a cascade of binary filters, this work demonstrates that IR choice, not model choice, is the dominant factor governing end-to-end success, a phenomenon termed the representation bottleneck. An evaluation of three frontier LLMs across six IRs spanning Verilog, VHDL, Chisel, Bluespec, PyMTL3, and HLS C on 202 tasks through a pipeline of compilation, simulation, FPGA synthesis on a Lattice iCE40UP5K, and LLM-based repair shows that simulation pass rates range from 3% to 88% across IRs but typically vary less than 1.25x across models within any single IR. On the resource-constrained iCE40, LLM designs achieve a higher conditional FPGA pass rate than reference solutions, 86.5% vs. 68.7%, not because they are better but because a simplicity bias makes them small enough to fit. The analysis reveals an accessibility-competence paradox: the most user-friendly IRs yield the worst LLM performance, suggesting that optimal IR selection will evolve as LLM capabilities grow.

Weimin Fu, Zeng Wang, Minghao Shao et al.

RTL generation demands more than software code synthesis: designs must be syntactically valid, synthesizable, functionally correct, and hardware-efficient. Existing evaluations stop at functional correctness, leaving synthesizability and implementation quality unmeasured. We evaluate 32 language models on 202 Verilog tasks from VerilogEval and RTLLM, with five attempts each, scoring via the Hardware Quality Index (HQI), a 0--100 metric integrating post-synthesis area, delay, and warning count relative to expert references under a Nangate45 45\,nm flow. Three performance tiers emerge: 13 frontier models achieve Global HQI above 71, led by Gemini-3-Pro (87.5\% coverage, 85.1 HQI); 11 mid-tier models cluster at 53--68; 8 fall below 53. The capability-to-deployment gap (best-of-five vs.\ single-attempt) spans 3.8--22.1 HQI points, motivating multi-sample strategies. A tool-adjudicated taxonomy of 195 genuine synthesis failures reveals systematic divergence: proprietary models fail late through elaboration errors and synthesis timeout; open-weight models fail early through missing module wrappers and non-synthesizable constructs, consistent with training on simulation-grade rather than synthesis-grade RTL. Rankings hold across three technology libraries at Spearman~$ρ> 0.99$.

Zeng Wang, Weihua Xiao, Minghao Shao et al.

Large Language Models (LLMs) show strong performance in RTL generation, but different models excel on different tasks because of architecture and training differences. Prior work mainly prompts or finetunes a single model. What remains not well studied is how to coordinate multiple different LLMs so they jointly improve RTL quality while also reducing cost, instead of running all models and choosing the best output. We define this as the multi-LLM RTL generation problem. We propose VeriDispatcher, a multi-LLM RTL generation framework that dispatches each RTL task to suitable LLMs based on pre-inference difficulty prediction. For each model, we train a compact classifier over semantic embeddings of task descriptions, using difficulty scores derived from benchmark variants that combine syntax, structural similarity, and functional correctness. At inference, VeriDispatcher uses these predictors to route tasks to a selected subset of LLMs. Across 10 diverse LLMs on RTLLM and VerilogEval, VeriDispatcher achieves up to 18% accuracy improvement on RTLLM using only 40% of commercial calls, and on VerilogEval maintains accuracy while reducing commercial usage by 25%, enabling cost-effective, high-quality LLM deployment in hardware design automation.