18.0LGJan 27, 2023
Aleatoric and Epistemic Discrimination: Fundamental Limits of Fairness InterventionsHao Wang, Luxi He, Rui Gao et al.
Machine learning (ML) models can underperform on certain population groups due to choices made during model development and bias inherent in the data. We categorize sources of discrimination in the ML pipeline into two classes: aleatoric discrimination, which is inherent in the data distribution, and epistemic discrimination, which is due to decisions made during model development. We quantify aleatoric discrimination by determining the performance limits of a model under fairness constraints, assuming perfect knowledge of the data distribution. We demonstrate how to characterize aleatoric discrimination by applying Blackwell's results on comparing statistical experiments. We then quantify epistemic discrimination as the gap between a model's accuracy when fairness constraints are applied and the limit posed by aleatoric discrimination. We apply this approach to benchmark existing fairness interventions and investigate fairness risks in data with missing values. Our results indicate that state-of-the-art fairness interventions are effective at removing epistemic discrimination on standard (overused) tabular datasets. However, when data has missing values, there is still significant room for improvement in handling aleatoric discrimination.
3.7CVFeb 23, 2022
Absolute Zero-Shot LearningRui Gao, Fan Wan, Daniel Organisciak et al.
Considering the increasing concerns about data copyright and privacy issues, we present a novel Absolute Zero-Shot Learning (AZSL) paradigm, i.e., training a classifier with zero real data. The key innovation is to involve a teacher model as the data safeguard to guide the AZSL model training without data leaking. The AZSL model consists of a generator and student network, which can achieve date-free knowledge transfer while maintaining the performance of the teacher network. We investigate `black-box' and `white-box' scenarios in AZSL task as different levels of model security. Besides, we also provide discussion of teacher model in both inductive and transductive settings. Despite embarrassingly simple implementations and data-missing disadvantages, our AZSL framework can retain state-of-the-art ZSL and GZSL performance under the `white-box' scenario. Extensive qualitative and quantitative analysis also demonstrates promising results when deploying the model under `black-box' scenario.
15.5MLFeb 5, 2021
Generalization Bounds for Noisy Iterative Algorithms Using Properties of Additive Noise ChannelsHao Wang, Rui Gao, Flavio P. Calmon
Machine learning models trained by different optimization algorithms under different data distributions can exhibit distinct generalization behaviors. In this paper, we analyze the generalization of models trained by noisy iterative algorithms. We derive distribution-dependent generalization bounds by connecting noisy iterative algorithms to additive noise channels found in communication and information theory. Our generalization bounds shed light on several applications, including differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD), federated learning, and stochastic gradient Langevin dynamics (SGLD). We demonstrate our bounds through numerical experiments, showing that they can help understand recent empirical observations of the generalization phenomena of neural networks.