Jiansheng Li

Jiansheng Li, Shuqi Chai, Fan Xu et al.

This paper investigates the joint resource block group (RBG) scheduling and beamforming optimization problem for weighted sum-rate (WSR) maximization in multi-cell multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) downlink networks. While the Fast Fractional Programming (FastFP) framework provides a reliable model-driven solution, it suffers from conservative continuous beamforming updates and prohibitive computational overhead during the discrete RBG matching phase. To address these bottlenecks, we propose a joint deep unfolding framework comprising two core modules: P-Net and K-Net. For continuous beamforming, P-Net learns an adaptive relaxation factor along the analytical FastFP update direction. By strictly constraining this factor within an ascent-preserving interval, P-Net accelerates the optimization trajectory while rigorously retaining monotonic improvement and stationary-point convergence guarantees. For discrete RBG scheduling, K-Net learns a long-horizon priority policy that guides a low-complexity greedy assignment, effectively preserving the assignment quality while bypassing the high complexity of Hungarian matching. Both networks leverage analytical algorithmic priors and utilize recurrent parameter sharing, enabling flexible inference beyond the training horizon. Extensive simulations demonstrate that the proposed joint framework achieves higher WSR and faster execution times than conventional model-driven baselines, while generalizing robustly across unseen network scales, antenna configurations, and channel conditions without retraining.

Xingxuan Zhang, Jiansheng Li, Wenjing Chu et al.

We investigate the generalization boundaries of current Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) via comprehensive evaluation under out-of-distribution scenarios and domain-specific tasks. We evaluate their zero-shot generalization across synthetic images, real-world distributional shifts, and specialized datasets like medical and molecular imagery. Empirical results indicate that MLLMs struggle with generalization beyond common training domains, limiting their direct application without adaptation. To understand the cause of unreliable performance, we analyze three hypotheses: semantic misinterpretation, visual feature extraction insufficiency, and mapping deficiency. Results identify mapping deficiency as the primary hurdle. To address this problem, we show that in-context learning (ICL) can significantly enhance MLLMs' generalization, opening new avenues for overcoming generalization barriers. We further explore the robustness of ICL under distribution shifts and show its vulnerability to domain shifts, label shifts, and spurious correlation shifts between in-context examples and test data.

Xingxuan Zhang, Haoran Wang, Jiansheng Li et al.

Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 and LLaMA-3 utilize the powerful in-context learning (ICL) capability of Transformer architecture to learn on the fly from limited examples. While ICL underpins many LLM applications, its full potential remains hindered by a limited understanding of its generalization boundaries and vulnerabilities. We present a systematic investigation of transformers' generalization capability with ICL relative to training data coverage by defining a task-centric framework along three dimensions: inter-problem, intra-problem, and intra-task generalization. Through extensive simulation and real-world experiments, encompassing tasks such as function fitting, API calling, and translation, we find that transformers lack inter-problem generalization with ICL, but excel in intra-task and intra-problem generalization. When the training data includes a greater variety of mixed tasks, it significantly enhances the generalization ability of ICL on unseen tasks and even on known simple tasks. This guides us in designing training data to maximize the diversity of tasks covered and to combine different tasks whenever possible, rather than solely focusing on the target task for testing.

Jiansheng Li, Xingxuan Zhang, Hao Zou et al.

Current object detectors often suffer significant perfor-mance degradation in real-world applications when encountering distributional shifts. Consequently, the out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization capability of object detectors has garnered increasing attention from researchers. Despite this growing interest, there remains a lack of a large-scale, comprehensive dataset and evaluation benchmark with fine-grained annotations tailored to assess the OOD generalization on more intricate tasks like object detection and grounding. To address this gap, we introduce COUNTS, a large-scale OOD dataset with object-level annotations. COUNTS encompasses 14 natural distributional shifts, over 222K samples, and more than 1,196K labeled bounding boxes. Leveraging COUNTS, we introduce two novel benchmarks: O(OD)2 and OODG. O(OD)2 is designed to comprehensively evaluate the OOD generalization capabilities of object detectors by utilizing controlled distribution shifts between training and testing data. OODG, on the other hand, aims to assess the OOD generalization of grounding abilities in multimodal large language models (MLLMs). Our findings reveal that, while large models and extensive pre-training data substantially en hance performance in in-distribution (IID) scenarios, significant limitations and opportunities for improvement persist in OOD contexts for both object detectors and MLLMs. In visual grounding tasks, even the advanced GPT-4o and Gemini-1.5 only achieve 56.7% and 28.0% accuracy, respectively. We hope COUNTS facilitates advancements in the development and assessment of robust object detectors and MLLMs capable of maintaining high performance under distributional shifts.