Yimeng Wang

h-index9
2papers
308citations

2 Papers

3.3CLDec 18, 2023
Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis with Explicit Sentiment Augmentations

Jihong Ouyang, Zhiyao Yang, Silong Liang et al.

Aspect-based sentiment analysis (ABSA), a fine-grained sentiment classification task, has received much attention recently. Many works investigate sentiment information through opinion words, such as ''good'' and ''bad''. However, implicit sentiment widely exists in the ABSA dataset, which refers to the sentence containing no distinct opinion words but still expresses sentiment to the aspect term. To deal with implicit sentiment, this paper proposes an ABSA method that integrates explicit sentiment augmentations. And we propose an ABSA-specific augmentation method to create such augmentations. Specifically, we post-trains T5 by rule-based data. We employ Syntax Distance Weighting and Unlikelihood Contrastive Regularization in the training procedure to guide the model to generate an explicit sentiment. Meanwhile, we utilize the Constrained Beam Search to ensure the augmentation sentence contains the aspect terms. We test ABSA-ESA on two of the most popular benchmarks of ABSA. The results show that ABSA-ESA outperforms the SOTA baselines on implicit and explicit sentiment accuracy.

2.4AIJan 12
From "Thinking" to "Justifying": Aligning High-Stakes Explainability with Professional Communication Standards

Chen Qian, Yimeng Wang, Yu Chen et al.

Explainable AI (XAI) in high-stakes domains should help stakeholders trust and verify system outputs. Yet Chain-of-Thought methods reason before concluding, and logical gaps or hallucinations can yield conclusions that do not reliably align with their rationale. Thus, we propose "Result -> Justify", which constrains the output communication to present a conclusion before its structured justification. We introduce SEF (Structured Explainability Framework), operationalizing professional conventions (e.g., CREAC, BLUF) via six metrics for structure and grounding. Experiments across four tasks in three domains validate this approach: all six metrics correlate with correctness (r=0.20-0.42; p<0.001), and SEF achieves 83.9% accuracy (+5.3 over CoT). These results suggest structured justification can improve verifiability and may also improve reliability.