Lixue Yin

Zahratu Shabrina, Muhammad Asa, Jin Rui et al.

This research investigates the potential of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to infer building typologies: Construction, Current Use, and Storeys from Google Street View (GSV) images. Predictions generated by VLMs are compared with inference by human experts (civil engineers and architects) as a source of manually labelled ground-truth data. We evaluate several state-of-the-art VLMs, including GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Gemini 2.0 Flash. By applying different scaling strategies and prompting techniques, we found that Chain-of-Thought prompts provide an overall more stable model performance. We also investigate the reasoning behind VLMs' building-typology predictions by examining the probabilities of keywords appearing in AI explanations. This enabled us to analyse patterns in these reasonings and identify key themes driving both agreements and disagreements between VLM and expert labels. We find that AI tends to focus on visual indicators, whereas human experts place greater emphasis on broader contextual cues and domain knowledge, in addition to visual cues. Overall, VLM can approximate experts' capability in building-typology classification at scale, with an average accuracy of approximately 70%. The study demonstrates the VLM's potential for AI automation in tasks that require pattern recognition and object identification in an urban context. AI have the potential to serve as complementary and collaborative tools for urban analysis, leveraging their strengths in understanding visual patterns. This study contributes to the exploration of the efficiency and scalability of AI visual prediction and provides insights into the reasoning processes that could support automation processes in urban analysis and prediction.

Jordan Painter, Dipankar Srirag, Adarsh Kappiyath et al.

Large language models increasingly \emph{understand} dialectal English, yet still \emph{produce} only standard, US-leaning English, leaving dialectal generation, the harder half of the problem, largely unaddressed. We introduce \textbf{DiaLLM}, which continually pretrains three open-weight language model families on the International Corpus of English and applies implicit and explicit post-training paradigms, each combined with three model alignment strategies, giving the first controlled comparison of these components across Australian, Indian, and Northern British English. Our results reveal that dialectal robustness and generation are \emph{dissociated}: benchmarks are shaped by continual pretraining and SFT, while alignment visibly reshapes generation in ways benchmarks do not capture. Explicit variety-targeted adaptation produces output reliably recognised as dialectal and preferred over broad alignment, yet the method that most aggressively optimises the dialectal reward is not preferred by human evaluators. Independent linguistic analysis corroborates this reward-quality gap, most clearly on two of the three families. No single alignment method dominates, and closing the gap will require richer reward designs and continued investment in dialectal resources. We release all code, checkpoints, and preference datasets.

Bo Peng, Xiaofeng Li, Xinyu Li et al.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and cardiac amyloidosis (CA) are both heart conditions that can progress to heart failure if untreated. They exhibit similar echocardiographic characteristics, often leading to diagnostic challenges. This paper introduces a novel multi-view deep learning approach that utilizes 2D echocardiography for differentiating between HCM and CA. The method begins by classifying 2D echocardiography data into five distinct echocardiographic views: apical 4-chamber, parasternal long axis of left ventricle, parasternal short axis at levels of the mitral valve, papillary muscle, and apex. It then extracts features of each view separately and combines five features for disease classification. A total of 212 patients diagnosed with HCM, and 30 patients diagnosed with CA, along with 200 individuals with normal cardiac function(Normal), were enrolled in this study from 2018 to 2022. This approach achieved a precision, recall of 0.905, and micro-F1 score of 0.904, demonstrating its effectiveness in accurately identifying HCM and CA using a multi-view analysis.