Xiaoying Wang

Yongsheng Yang, Xiaoying Wang

In the digital age of today, the internet has become an indispensable platform for people's lives, work, and information exchange. However, the problem of violent text proliferation in the network environment has arisen, which has brought about many negative effects. In view of this situation, it is particularly important to build an effective system for cutting off violent text. The study of violent text cutting off based on the BERT-fasttext model has significant meaning. BERT is a pre-trained language model with strong natural language understanding ability, which can deeply mine and analyze text semantic information; Fasttext itself is an efficient text classification tool with low complexity and good effect, which can quickly provide basic judgments for text processing. By combining the two and applying them to the system for cutting off violent text, on the one hand, it can accurately identify violent text, and on the other hand, it can efficiently and reasonably cut off the content, preventing harmful information from spreading freely on the network. Compared with the single BERT model and fasttext, the accuracy was improved by 0.7% and 0.8%, respectively. Through this model, it is helpful to purify the network environment, maintain the health of network information, and create a positive, civilized, and harmonious online communication space for netizens, driving the development of social networking, information dissemination, and other aspects in a more benign direction.

Xiaoying Wang, Changbo Qu, Weiyuan Wu et al.

Cardinality estimation is a fundamental but long unresolved problem in query optimization. Recently, multiple papers from different research groups consistently report that learned models have the potential to replace existing cardinality estimators. In this paper, we ask a forward-thinking question: Are we ready to deploy these learned cardinality models in production? Our study consists of three main parts. Firstly, we focus on the static environment (i.e., no data updates) and compare five new learned methods with eight traditional methods on four real-world datasets under a unified workload setting. The results show that learned models are indeed more accurate than traditional methods, but they often suffer from high training and inference costs. Secondly, we explore whether these learned models are ready for dynamic environments (i.e., frequent data updates). We find that they cannot catch up with fast data up-dates and return large errors for different reasons. For less frequent updates, they can perform better but there is no clear winner among themselves. Thirdly, we take a deeper look into learned models and explore when they may go wrong. Our results show that the performance of learned methods can be greatly affected by the changes in correlation, skewness, or domain size. More importantly, their behaviors are much harder to interpret and often unpredictable. Based on these findings, we identify two promising research directions (control the cost of learned models and make learned models trustworthy) and suggest a number of research opportunities. We hope that our study can guide researchers and practitioners to work together to eventually push learned cardinality estimators into real database systems.