Fan Huang

h-index11
2papers
292citations

2 Papers

2.8CVFeb 17, 2023
Random Padding Data Augmentation

Nan Yang, Laicheng Zhong, Fan Huang et al.

The convolutional neural network (CNN) learns the same object in different positions in images, which can improve the recognition accuracy of the model. An implication of this is that CNN may know where the object is. The usefulness of the features' spatial information in CNNs has not been well investigated. In this paper, we found that the model's learning of features' position information hindered the learning of the features' relationship. Therefore, we introduced Random Padding, a new type of padding method for training CNNs that impairs the architecture's capacity to learn position information by adding zero-padding randomly to half of the border of feature maps. Random Padding is parameter-free, simple to construct, and compatible with the majority of CNN-based recognition models. This technique is also complementary to data augmentations such as random cropping, rotation, flipping and erasing, and consistently improves the performance of image classification over strong baselines.

25.5CLMar 26, 2024Code
ChatGPT Rates Natural Language Explanation Quality Like Humans: But on Which Scales?

Fan Huang, Haewoon Kwak, Kunwoo Park et al.

As AI becomes more integral in our lives, the need for transparency and responsibility grows. While natural language explanations (NLEs) are vital for clarifying the reasoning behind AI decisions, evaluating them through human judgments is complex and resource-intensive due to subjectivity and the need for fine-grained ratings. This study explores the alignment between ChatGPT and human assessments across multiple scales (i.e., binary, ternary, and 7-Likert scale). We sample 300 data instances from three NLE datasets and collect 900 human annotations for both informativeness and clarity scores as the text quality measurement. We further conduct paired comparison experiments under different ranges of subjectivity scores, where the baseline comes from 8,346 human annotations. Our results show that ChatGPT aligns better with humans in more coarse-grained scales. Also, paired comparisons and dynamic prompting (i.e., providing semantically similar examples in the prompt) improve the alignment. This research advances our understanding of large language models' capabilities to assess the text explanation quality in different configurations for responsible AI development.