David Perera

David Perera, Victor Letzelter, Théo Mariotte et al.

We introduce Annealed Multiple Choice Learning (aMCL) which combines simulated annealing with MCL. MCL is a learning framework handling ambiguous tasks by predicting a small set of plausible hypotheses. These hypotheses are trained using the Winner-takes-all (WTA) scheme, which promotes the diversity of the predictions. However, this scheme may converge toward an arbitrarily suboptimal local minimum, due to the greedy nature of WTA. We overcome this limitation using annealing, which enhances the exploration of the hypothesis space during training. We leverage insights from statistical physics and information theory to provide a detailed description of the model training trajectory. Additionally, we validate our algorithm by extensive experiments on synthetic datasets, on the standard UCI benchmark, and on speech separation.

David Perera, Victor Moura, Lais Isabelle Alves dos Santos et al.

Characterizing precisely the asymptotic generalization error of neural networks using parameters that can be estimated efficiently is a crucial problem in machine learning, which relies heavily on heuristics and practitioners' intuition to make key design choices. In order to mitigate this issue, we introduce the Representation Gap, a metric closely related to the generalization error, but admitting better-behaved asymptotic dynamics. Focusing on equivariant diffusion models and leveraging results from optimal quantization and point-process theory, we derive a precise asymptotic equivalent of the Representation Gap and show that it is governed by a single parameter, the \textit{intrinsic dimension} of the task, which is easy to interpret, efficient to estimate, and can be linked to the equivariances of common neural network architectures. We show that this asymptotic dynamic also extends to a broader range of tasks and training algorithms. Finally, we demonstrate empirically that our asymptotic law and intrinsic dimension estimation are accurate on a wide range of synthetic datasets, where these quantities are known, as well as on more realistic datasets, where we obtain results consistent with the related literature.

David Perera, François Derrida, Théo Mariotte et al.

Training speech separation models in the supervised setting raises a permutation problem: finding the best assignation between the model predictions and the ground truth separated signals. This inherently ambiguous task is customarily solved using Permutation Invariant Training (PIT). In this article, we instead consider using the Multiple Choice Learning (MCL) framework, which was originally introduced to tackle ambiguous tasks. We demonstrate experimentally on the popular WSJ0-mix and LibriMix benchmarks that MCL matches the performances of PIT, while being computationally advantageous. This opens the door to a promising research direction, as MCL can be naturally extended to handle a variable number of speakers, or to tackle speech separation in the unsupervised setting.

Victor Letzelter, David Perera, Cédric Rommel et al.

Winner-takes-all training is a simple learning paradigm, which handles ambiguous tasks by predicting a set of plausible hypotheses. Recently, a connection was established between Winner-takes-all training and centroidal Voronoi tessellations, showing that, once trained, hypotheses should quantize optimally the shape of the conditional distribution to predict. However, the best use of these hypotheses for uncertainty quantification is still an open question. In this work, we show how to leverage the appealing geometric properties of the Winner-takes-all learners for conditional density estimation, without modifying its original training scheme. We theoretically establish the advantages of our novel estimator both in terms of quantization and density estimation, and we demonstrate its competitiveness on synthetic and real-world datasets, including audio data.