Caleb Ju

Caleb Ju, Guanghui Lan

Reinforcement learning (RL) problems over general state and action spaces are notoriously challenging. In contrast to the tableau setting, one can not enumerate all the states and then iteratively update the policies for each state. This prevents the application of many well-studied RL methods especially those with provable convergence guarantees. In this paper, we first present a substantial generalization of the recently developed policy mirror descent method to deal with general state and action spaces. We introduce new approaches to incorporate function approximation into this method, so that we do not need to use explicit policy parameterization at all. Moreover, we present a novel policy dual averaging method for which possibly simpler function approximation techniques can be applied. We establish linear convergence rate to global optimality or sublinear convergence to stationarity for these methods applied to solve different classes of RL problems under exact policy evaluation. We then define proper notions of the approximation errors for policy evaluation and investigate their impact on the convergence of these methods applied to general-state RL problems with either finite-action or continuous-action spaces. To the best of our knowledge, the development of these algorithmic frameworks as well as their convergence analysis appear to be new in the literature. Preliminary numerical results demonstrate the robustness of the aforementioned methods and show they can be competitive with state-of-the-art RL algorithms.

Ji Gao, Caleb Ju, Guanghui Lan et al.

Policy Dual Averaging (PDA) offers a principled Policy Mirror Descent (PMD) framework that more naturally admits value function approximation than standard PMD, enabling the use of approximate advantage (or Q-) functions while retaining strong convergence guarantees. However, applying PDA in continuous state and action spaces remains computationally challenging, since action selection involves solving an optimization sub-problem at each decision step. In this paper, we propose \textit{actor-accelerated PDA}, which uses a learned policy network to approximate the solution of the optimization sub-problems, yielding faster runtimes while maintaining convergence guarantees. We provide a theoretical analysis that quantifies how actor approximation error impacts the convergence of PDA under suitable assumptions. We then evaluate its performance on several benchmarks in robotics, control, and operations research problems. Actor-accelerated PDA achieves superior performance compared to popular on-policy baselines such as Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO). Overall, our results bridge the gap between the theoretical advantages of PDA and its practical deployment in continuous-action problems with function approximation.

Caleb Ju, Guanghui Lan

This paper proposes a novel termination criterion, termed the advantage gap function, for finite state and action Markov decision processes (MDP) and reinforcement learning (RL). By incorporating this advantage gap function into the design of step size rules and deriving a new linear rate of convergence that is independent of the stationary state distribution of the optimal policy, we demonstrate that policy gradient methods can solve MDPs in strongly-polynomial time. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that such strong convergence properties have been established for policy gradient methods. Moreover, in the stochastic setting, where only stochastic estimates of policy gradients are available, we show that the advantage gap function provides close approximations of the optimality gap for each individual state and exhibits a sublinear rate of convergence at every state. The advantage gap function can be easily estimated in the stochastic case, and when coupled with easily computable upper bounds on policy values, they provide a convenient way to validate the solutions generated by policy gradient methods. Therefore, our developments offer a principled and computable measure of optimality for RL, whereas current practice tends to rely on algorithm-to-algorithm or baselines comparisons with no certificate of optimality.

Caleb Ju, Constance Crozier

Variable renewable generation increases the challenge of balancing power supply and demand. Grid-scale batteries co-located with generation can help mitigate this misalignment. This paper explores the use of reinforcement learning (RL) for operating grid-scale batteries co-located with solar power. Our results show RL achieves an average of 61% (and up to 96%) of the approximate theoretical optimal (non-causal) operation, outperforming advanced control methods on average. Our findings suggest RL may be preferred when future signals are hard to predict. Moreover, RL has two significant advantages compared to simpler rules-based control: (1) that solar energy is more effectively shifted towards high demand periods, and (2) increased diversity of battery dispatch across different locations, reducing potential ramping issues caused by super-position of many similar actions.

Yan Li, Caleb Ju, Ethan X. Fang et al.

Bregman proximal point algorithm (BPPA) has witnessed emerging machine learning applications, yet its theoretical understanding has been largely unexplored. We study the computational properties of BPPA through learning linear classifiers with separable data, and demonstrate provable algorithmic regularization of BPPA. For any BPPA instantiated with a fixed Bregman divergence, we provide a lower bound of the margin obtained by BPPA with respect to an arbitrarily chosen norm. The obtained margin lower bound differs from the maximal margin by a multiplicative factor, which inversely depends on the condition number of the distance-generating function measured in the dual norm. We show that the dependence on the condition number is tight, thus demonstrating the importance of divergence in affecting the quality of the learned classifiers. We then extend our findings to mirror descent, for which we establish similar connections between the margin and Bregman divergence, together with a non-asymptotic analysis. Numerical experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets are provided to support our theoretical findings. To the best of our knowledge, the aforementioned findings appear to be new in the literature of algorithmic regularization.