Remy Demichelis

Remy Demichelis

The aim of this article is to understand the problem of "black box" algorithms, an issue inherent to the nascent field of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI). While it is relatively easy to understand something someone explained to us, it becomes more complicated when no one can fully grasp the issue. Our purpose is however to highlight: (1) that we should speak of interpretability rather than explainability when we seek to understand models, mainly because we never have complete and unambiguous access to information; (2) that the machines face the problem of the inscrutability of reference, in the same way that the linguist imagined by Willard Van Orman Quine cannot precisely determine what the term "gavagai" refers to in a situation of radical translation; (3) that there is no rule for the application of language, except for "language games", as Ludwig Wittgenstein's linguistics teaches us. The hope of achieving complete explicability and transparency of algorithms is undoubtedly in vain: we can only rely on partial and broad interpretations that will never fully explain the underlying rules.

Remy Demichelis

This article aims to demonstrate how the approach to computing is being disrupted by deep learning (artificial neural networks), not only in terms of techniques but also in our interactions with machines. It also addresses the philosophical tradition of hermeneutics (Don Ihde, Wilhelm Dilthey) to highlight a parallel with this movement and to demystify the idea of human-like AI.

Remy Demichelis

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems, such as machine learning algorithms, have allowed scientists, marketers and governments to shed light on correlations that remained invisible until now. Beforehand, the dots that we had to connect in order to imagine a new knowledge were either too numerous, too sparse or not even detected. Sometimes, the information was not stored in the same data lake or format and was not able to communicate. But in creating new bridges with AI, many problems appeared such as bias reproduction, unfair inferences or mass surveillance. Our aim is to show that, on one hand, the AI's deep ethical problem lays essentially in these new connections made possible by systems interoperability. In connecting the spheres of our life, these systems undermine the notion of justice particular to each of them, because the new interactions create dominances of social goods from a sphere to another. These systems make therefore spheres permeable to one another and, in doing so, they open to progress as well as to tyranny. On another hand, however, we would like to emphasize that the act to connect what used to seem a priori disjoint is a necessary move of knowledge and scientific progress.