Sayantan Sen

LG
h-index26
3papers
1citation
Novelty63%
AI Score39

3 Papers

3.2DSMar 30
Testing Sparse Functions over the Reals

Vipul Arora, Arnab Bhattacharyya, Philips George John et al.

Over the last three decades, function testing has been extensively studied over Boolean, finite fields, and discrete settings. However, to encode the real-world applications more succinctly, function testing over the reals (where the domain and range, both are reals) is of prime importance. Recently, there have been some works in the direction of testing for algebraic representations of such functions: the work by Fleming and Yoshida (ITCS 20), Arora, Kelman, and Meir (SOSA 25) on linearity testing and the work of Arora, Bhattacharyya, Fleming, Kelman, and Yoshida (SODA 23) for testing low-degree polynomials. Our work follows the same avenue, wherein we study three well-studied sparse representations of functions, over the reals, namely (i) $k$-linearity, (ii) $k$-sparse polynomials, and (iii) $k$-junta. In this setting, given approximate query access to some $f:\mathbb{R}^n \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$, we want to decide if the function satisfies some property of interest, or if it is far from all functions that satisfy the property. Here, the distance is measured in the $\ell_1$-metric, under the assumption that we are drawing samples from the Standard Gaussian distribution. We present efficient testers and $Ω(k)$ lower bounds for testing each of these three properties.

LGNov 18, 2024
Efficient Sample-optimal Learning of Gaussian Tree Models via Sample-optimal Testing of Gaussian Mutual Information

Sutanu Gayen, Sanket Kale, Sayantan Sen

Learning high-dimensional distributions is a significant challenge in machine learning and statistics. Classical research has mostly concentrated on asymptotic analysis of such data under suitable assumptions. While existing works [Bhattacharyya et al.: SICOMP 2023, Daskalakis et al.: STOC 2021, Choo et al.: ALT 2024] focus on discrete distributions, the current work addresses the tree structure learning problem for Gaussian distributions, providing efficient algorithms with solid theoretical guarantees. This is crucial as real-world distributions are often continuous and differ from the discrete scenarios studied in prior works. In this work, we design a conditional mutual information tester for Gaussian random variables that can test whether two Gaussian random variables are independent, or their conditional mutual information is at least $\varepsilon$, for some parameter $\varepsilon \in (0,1)$ using $\mathcal{O}(\varepsilon^{-1})$ samples which we show to be near-optimal. In contrast, an additive estimation would require $Ω(\varepsilon^{-2})$ samples. Our upper bound technique uses linear regression on a pair of suitably transformed random variables. Importantly, we show that the chain rule of conditional mutual information continues to hold for the estimated (conditional) mutual information. As an application of such a mutual information tester, we give an efficient $\varepsilon$-approximate structure-learning algorithm for an $n$-variate Gaussian tree model that takes $\widetildeΘ(n\varepsilon^{-1})$ samples which we again show to be near-optimal. In contrast, when the underlying Gaussian model is not known to be tree-structured, we show that $\widetilde{Θ}(n^2\varepsilon^{-2})$ samples are necessary and sufficient to output an $\varepsilon$-approximate tree structure. We perform extensive experiments that corroborate our theoretical convergence bounds.

LGMay 13, 2024
Distribution Learning Meets Graph Structure Sampling

Arnab Bhattacharyya, Sutanu Gayen, Philips George John et al.

This work establishes a novel link between the problem of PAC-learning high-dimensional graphical models and the task of (efficient) counting and sampling of graph structures, using an online learning framework. We observe that if we apply the exponentially weighted average (EWA) or randomized weighted majority (RWM) forecasters on a sequence of samples from a distribution P using the log loss function, the average regret incurred by the forecaster's predictions can be used to bound the expected KL divergence between P and the predictions. Known regret bounds for EWA and RWM then yield new sample complexity bounds for learning Bayes nets. Moreover, these algorithms can be made computationally efficient for several interesting classes of Bayes nets. Specifically, we give a new sample-optimal and polynomial time learning algorithm with respect to trees of unknown structure and the first polynomial sample and time algorithm for learning with respect to Bayes nets over a given chordal skeleton.