AdamNODEs: When Neural ODE Meets Adaptive Moment EstimationSuneghyeon Cho, Sanghyun Hong, Kookjin Lee et al.
Recent work by Xia et al. leveraged the continuous-limit of the classical momentum accelerated gradient descent and proposed heavy-ball neural ODEs. While this model offers computational efficiency and high utility over vanilla neural ODEs, this approach often causes the overshooting of internal dynamics, leading to unstable training of a model. Prior work addresses this issue by using ad-hoc approaches, e.g., bounding the internal dynamics using specific activation functions, but the resulting models do not satisfy the exact heavy-ball ODE. In this work, we propose adaptive momentum estimation neural ODEs (AdamNODEs) that adaptively control the acceleration of the classical momentum-based approach. We find that its adjoint states also satisfy AdamODE and do not require ad-hoc solutions that the prior work employs. In evaluation, we show that AdamNODEs achieve the lowest training loss and efficacy over existing neural ODEs. We also show that AdamNODEs have better training stability than classical momentum-based neural ODEs. This result sheds some light on adapting the techniques proposed in the optimization community to improving the training and inference of neural ODEs further. Our code is available at https://github.com/pmcsh04/AdamNODE.
5.8LGNov 22, 2022
Time Series Forecasting with Hypernetworks Generating Parameters in AdvanceJaehoon Lee, Chan Kim, Gyumin Lee et al.
Forecasting future outcomes from recent time series data is not easy, especially when the future data are different from the past (i.e. time series are under temporal drifts). Existing approaches show limited performances under data drifts, and we identify the main reason: It takes time for a model to collect sufficient training data and adjust its parameters for complicated temporal patterns whenever the underlying dynamics change. To address this issue, we study a new approach; instead of adjusting model parameters (by continuously re-training a model on new data), we build a hypernetwork that generates other target models' parameters expected to perform well on the future data. Therefore, we can adjust the model parameters beforehand (if the hypernetwork is correct). We conduct extensive experiments with 6 target models, 6 baselines, and 4 datasets, and show that our HyperGPA outperforms other baselines.
7.0CRDec 28, 2022
Publishing Efficient On-device Models Increases Adversarial VulnerabilitySanghyun Hong, Nicholas Carlini, Alexey Kurakin
Recent increases in the computational demands of deep neural networks (DNNs) have sparked interest in efficient deep learning mechanisms, e.g., quantization or pruning. These mechanisms enable the construction of a small, efficient version of commercial-scale models with comparable accuracy, accelerating their deployment to resource-constrained devices. In this paper, we study the security considerations of publishing on-device variants of large-scale models. We first show that an adversary can exploit on-device models to make attacking the large models easier. In evaluations across 19 DNNs, by exploiting the published on-device models as a transfer prior, the adversarial vulnerability of the original commercial-scale models increases by up to 100x. We then show that the vulnerability increases as the similarity between a full-scale and its efficient model increase. Based on the insights, we propose a defense, $similarity$-$unpairing$, that fine-tunes on-device models with the objective of reducing the similarity. We evaluated our defense on all the 19 DNNs and found that it reduces the transferability up to 90% and the number of queries required by a factor of 10-100x. Our results suggest that further research is needed on the security (or even privacy) threats caused by publishing those efficient siblings.
3.3LGOct 10, 2022
Mining Causality from Continuous-time Dynamics Models: An Application to Tsunami ForecastingFan Wu, Sanghyun Hong, Donsub Rim et al.
Continuous-time dynamics models, such as neural ordinary differential equations, have enabled the modeling of underlying dynamics in time-series data and accurate forecasting. However, parameterization of dynamics using a neural network makes it difficult for humans to identify causal structures in the data. In consequence, this opaqueness hinders the use of these models in the domains where capturing causal relationships carries the same importance as accurate predictions, e.g., tsunami forecasting. In this paper, we address this challenge by proposing a mechanism for mining causal structures from continuous-time models. We train models to capture the causal structure by enforcing sparsity in the weights of the input layers of the dynamics models. We first verify the effectiveness of our method in the scenario where the exact causal-structures of time-series are known as a priori. We next apply our method to a real-world problem, namely tsunami forecasting, where the exact causal-structures are difficult to characterize. Experimental results show that the proposed method is effective in learning physically-consistent causal relationships while achieving high forecasting accuracy.
22.7CRApr 1, 2024Code
Privacy Backdoors: Enhancing Membership Inference through Poisoning Pre-trained ModelsYuxin Wen, Leo Marchyok, Sanghyun Hong et al.
It is commonplace to produce application-specific models by fine-tuning large pre-trained models using a small bespoke dataset. The widespread availability of foundation model checkpoints on the web poses considerable risks, including the vulnerability to backdoor attacks. In this paper, we unveil a new vulnerability: the privacy backdoor attack. This black-box privacy attack aims to amplify the privacy leakage that arises when fine-tuning a model: when a victim fine-tunes a backdoored model, their training data will be leaked at a significantly higher rate than if they had fine-tuned a typical model. We conduct extensive experiments on various datasets and models, including both vision-language models (CLIP) and large language models, demonstrating the broad applicability and effectiveness of such an attack. Additionally, we carry out multiple ablation studies with different fine-tuning methods and inference strategies to thoroughly analyze this new threat. Our findings highlight a critical privacy concern within the machine learning community and call for a reevaluation of safety protocols in the use of open-source pre-trained models.
26.8CRNov 27, 2024
SoK: Watermarking for AI-Generated ContentXuandong Zhao, Sam Gunn, Miranda Christ et al. · berkeley, eth-zurich
As the outputs of generative AI (GenAI) techniques improve in quality, it becomes increasingly challenging to distinguish them from human-created content. Watermarking schemes are a promising approach to address the problem of distinguishing between AI and human-generated content. These schemes embed hidden signals within AI-generated content to enable reliable detection. While watermarking is not a silver bullet for addressing all risks associated with GenAI, it can play a crucial role in enhancing AI safety and trustworthiness by combating misinformation and deception. This paper presents a comprehensive overview of watermarking techniques for GenAI, beginning with the need for watermarking from historical and regulatory perspectives. We formalize the definitions and desired properties of watermarking schemes and examine the key objectives and threat models for existing approaches. Practical evaluation strategies are also explored, providing insights into the development of robust watermarking techniques capable of resisting various attacks. Additionally, we review recent representative works, highlight open challenges, and discuss potential directions for this emerging field. By offering a thorough understanding of watermarking in GenAI, this work aims to guide researchers in advancing watermarking methods and applications, and support policymakers in addressing the broader implications of GenAI.
5.3LGDec 16, 2023
Operator-learning-inspired Modeling of Neural Ordinary Differential EquationsWoojin Cho, Seunghyeon Cho, Hyundong Jin et al.
Neural ordinary differential equations (NODEs), one of the most influential works of the differential equation-based deep learning, are to continuously generalize residual networks and opened a new field. They are currently utilized for various downstream tasks, e.g., image classification, time series classification, image generation, etc. Its key part is how to model the time-derivative of the hidden state, denoted dh(t)/dt. People have habitually used conventional neural network architectures, e.g., fully-connected layers followed by non-linear activations. In this paper, however, we present a neural operator-based method to define the time-derivative term. Neural operators were initially proposed to model the differential operator of partial differential equations (PDEs). Since the time-derivative of NODEs can be understood as a special type of the differential operator, our proposed method, called branched Fourier neural operator (BFNO), makes sense. In our experiments with general downstream tasks, our method significantly outperforms existing methods.
5.8CRMar 18, 2024
Certified Robustness to Clean-Label Poisoning Using Diffusion DenoisingSanghyun Hong, Nicholas Carlini, Alexey Kurakin
We present a certified defense to clean-label poisoning attacks under $\ell_2$-norm. These attacks work by injecting a small number of poisoning samples (e.g., 1%) that contain bounded adversarial perturbations into the training data to induce a targeted misclassification of a test-time input. Inspired by the adversarial robustness achieved by $randomized$ $smoothing$, we show how an off-the-shelf diffusion denoising model can sanitize the tampered training data. We extensively test our defense against seven clean-label poisoning attacks in both $\ell_2$ and $\ell_{\infty}$-norms and reduce their attack success to 0-16% with only a negligible drop in the test accuracy. We compare our defense with existing countermeasures against clean-label poisoning, showing that the defense reduces the attack success the most and offers the best model utility. Our results highlight the need for future work on developing stronger clean-label attacks and using our certified yet practical defense as a strong baseline to evaluate these attacks.
5.2CVOct 26, 2024
You Never Know: Quantization Induces Inconsistent Biases in Vision-Language Foundation ModelsEric Slyman, Anirudh Kanneganti, Sanghyun Hong et al.
We study the impact of a standard practice in compressing foundation vision-language models - quantization - on the models' ability to produce socially-fair outputs. In contrast to prior findings with unimodal models that compression consistently amplifies social biases, our extensive evaluation of four quantization settings across three datasets and three CLIP variants yields a surprising result: while individual models demonstrate bias, we find no consistent change in bias magnitude or direction across a population of compressed models due to quantization.
37.0CRMar 31, 2022
Truth Serum: Poisoning Machine Learning Models to Reveal Their SecretsFlorian Tramèr, Reza Shokri, Ayrton San Joaquin et al.
We introduce a new class of attacks on machine learning models. We show that an adversary who can poison a training dataset can cause models trained on this dataset to leak significant private details of training points belonging to other parties. Our active inference attacks connect two independent lines of work targeting the integrity and privacy of machine learning training data. Our attacks are effective across membership inference, attribute inference, and data extraction. For example, our targeted attacks can poison <0.1% of the training dataset to boost the performance of inference attacks by 1 to 2 orders of magnitude. Further, an adversary who controls a significant fraction of the training data (e.g., 50%) can launch untargeted attacks that enable 8x more precise inference on all other users' otherwise-private data points. Our results cast doubts on the relevance of cryptographic privacy guarantees in multiparty computation protocols for machine learning, if parties can arbitrarily select their share of training data.
13.6LGJun 9, 2020
On the Effectiveness of Regularization Against Membership Inference AttacksYigitcan Kaya, Sanghyun Hong, Tudor Dumitras
Deep learning models often raise privacy concerns as they leak information about their training data. This enables an adversary to determine whether a data point was in a model's training set by conducting a membership inference attack (MIA). Prior work has conjectured that regularization techniques, which combat overfitting, may also mitigate the leakage. While many regularization mechanisms exist, their effectiveness against MIAs has not been studied systematically, and the resulting privacy properties are not well understood. We explore the lower bound for information leakage that practical attacks can achieve. First, we evaluate the effectiveness of 8 mechanisms in mitigating two recent MIAs, on three standard image classification tasks. We find that certain mechanisms, such as label smoothing, may inadvertently help MIAs. Second, we investigate the potential of improving the resilience to MIAs by combining complementary mechanisms. Finally, we quantify the opportunity of future MIAs to compromise privacy by designing a white-box `distance-to-confident' (DtC) metric, based on adversarial sample crafting. Our metric reveals that, even when existing MIAs fail, the training samples may remain distinguishable from test samples. This suggests that regularization mechanisms can provide a false sense of privacy, even when they appear effective against existing MIAs.
15.5CRJan 17, 2017
Summoning Demons: The Pursuit of Exploitable Bugs in Machine LearningRock Stevens, Octavian Suciu, Andrew Ruef et al.
Governments and businesses increasingly rely on data analytics and machine learning (ML) for improving their competitive edge in areas such as consumer satisfaction, threat intelligence, decision making, and product efficiency. However, by cleverly corrupting a subset of data used as input to a target's ML algorithms, an adversary can perturb outcomes and compromise the effectiveness of ML technology. While prior work in the field of adversarial machine learning has studied the impact of input manipulation on correct ML algorithms, we consider the exploitation of bugs in ML implementations. In this paper, we characterize the attack surface of ML programs, and we show that malicious inputs exploiting implementation bugs enable strictly more powerful attacks than the classic adversarial machine learning techniques. We propose a semi-automated technique, called steered fuzzing, for exploring this attack surface and for discovering exploitable bugs in machine learning programs, in order to demonstrate the magnitude of this threat. As a result of our work, we responsibly disclosed five vulnerabilities, established three new CVE-IDs, and illuminated a common insecure practice across many machine learning systems. Finally, we outline several research directions for further understanding and mitigating this threat.