Debankur Mukherjee

Neelkamal Bhuyan, Debankur Mukherjee, Adam Wierman

We study the smoothed online quadratic optimization (SOQO) problem where, at each round $t$, a player plays an action $x_t$ in response to a quadratic hitting cost and an additional squared $\ell_2$-norm cost for switching actions. This problem class has strong connections to a wide range of application domains including smart grid management, adaptive control, and data center management, where switching-efficient algorithms are highly sought after. We study the SOQO problem in both adversarial and stochastic settings, and in this process, perform the first stochastic analysis of this class of problems. We provide the online optimal algorithm when the minimizers of the hitting cost function evolve as a general stochastic process, which, for the case of martingale process, takes the form of a distribution-agnostic dynamic interpolation algorithm (LAI). Next, we present the stochastic-adversarial trade-off by proving an $Ω(T)$ expected regret for the adversarial optimal algorithm in the literature (ROBD) with respect to LAI and, a sub-optimal competitive ratio for LAI in the adversarial setting. Finally, we present a best-of-both-worlds algorithm that obtains a robust adversarial performance while simultaneously achieving a near-optimal stochastic performance.

Neelkamal Bhuyan, Debankur Mukherjee, Adam Wierman

This work addresses the fundamental problem of unbounded metric movement costs in bandit online convex optimization, by considering high-dimensional dynamic quadratic hitting costs and $\ell_2$-norm switching costs in a noisy bandit feedback model. For a general class of stochastic environments, we provide the first algorithm SCaLE that provably achieves a distribution-agnostic sub-linear dynamic regret, without the knowledge of hitting cost structure. En-route, we present a novel spectral regret analysis that separately quantifies eigenvalue-error driven regret and eigenbasis-perturbation driven regret. Extensive numerical experiments, against online-learning baselines, corroborate our claims, and highlight statistical consistency of our algorithm.

Neelkamal Bhuyan, Debankur Mukherjee, Adam Wierman

We study the multi-agent Smoothed Online Convex Optimization (SOCO) problem, where $N$ agents interact through a communication graph. In each round, each agent $i$ receives a strongly convex hitting cost function $f^i_t$ in an online fashion and selects an action $x^i_t \in \mathbb{R}^d$. The objective is to minimize the global cumulative cost, which includes the sum of individual hitting costs $f^i_t(x^i_t)$, a temporal "switching cost" for changing decisions, and a spatial "dissimilarity cost" that penalizes deviations in decisions among neighboring agents. We propose the first truly decentralized algorithm ACORD for multi-agent SOCO that provably exhibits asymptotic optimality. Our approach allows each agent to operate using only local information from its immediate neighbors in the graph. For finite-time performance, we establish that the optimality gap in the competitive ratio decreases with time horizon $T$ and can be conveniently tuned based on the per-round computation available to each agent. Our algorithm benefits from a provably scalable computational complexity that depends only logarithmically on the number of agents and almost linearly on their degree within the graph. Moreover, our results hold even when the communication graph changes arbitrarily and adaptively over time. Finally, ACORD, by virtue of its asymptotic-optimality, is shown to be provably superior to the state-of-the-art LPC algorithm, while exhibiting much lower computational complexity. Extensive numerical experiments across various network topologies further corroborate our theoretical claims.

Daan Rutten, Nico Christianson, Debankur Mukherjee et al.

We examine the problem of smoothed online optimization, where a decision maker must sequentially choose points in a normed vector space to minimize the sum of per-round, non-convex hitting costs and the costs of switching decisions between rounds. The decision maker has access to a black-box oracle, such as a machine learning model, that provides untrusted and potentially inaccurate predictions of the optimal decision in each round. The goal of the decision maker is to exploit the predictions if they are accurate, while guaranteeing performance that is not much worse than the hindsight optimal sequence of decisions, even when predictions are inaccurate. We impose the standard assumption that hitting costs are globally $α$-polyhedral. We propose a novel algorithm, Adaptive Online Switching (AOS), and prove that, for a large set of feasible $δ> 0$, it is $(1+δ)$-competitive if predictions are perfect, while also maintaining a uniformly bounded competitive ratio of $2^{\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(1/(αδ))}$ even when predictions are adversarial. Further, we prove that this trade-off is necessary and nearly optimal in the sense that \emph{any} deterministic algorithm which is $(1+δ)$-competitive if predictions are perfect must be at least $2^{\tildeΩ(1/(αδ))}$-competitive when predictions are inaccurate. In fact, we observe a unique threshold-type behavior in this trade-off: if $δ$ is not in the set of feasible options, then \emph{no} algorithm is simultaneously $(1 + δ)$-competitive if predictions are perfect and $ζ$-competitive when predictions are inaccurate for any $ζ< \infty$. Furthermore, we discuss that memory is crucial in AOS by proving that any algorithm that does not use memory cannot benefit from predictions. We complement our theoretical results by a numerical study on a microgrid application.

Daan Rutten, Debankur Mukherjee

Modern data centers suffer from immense power consumption. As a result, data center operators have heavily invested in capacity scaling solutions, which dynamically deactivate servers if the demand is low and activate them again when the workload increases. We analyze a continuous-time model for capacity scaling, where the goal is to minimize the weighted sum of flow-time, switching cost, and power consumption in an online fashion. We propose a novel algorithm, called Adaptive Balanced Capacity Scaling (ABCS), that has access to black-box machine learning predictions. ABCS aims to adapt to the predictions and is also robust against unpredictable surges in the workload. In particular, we prove that ABCS is $(1+\varepsilon)$-competitive if the predictions are accurate, and yet, it has a uniformly bounded competitive ratio even if the predictions are completely inaccurate. Finally, we investigate the performance of this algorithm on a real-world dataset and carry out extensive numerical experiments, which positively support the theoretical results.