Zikang Xie

Kailun Huang, Zikang Xie, Yanzhe Xie et al.

Humans primarily rely on walking and running to traverse complex terrains, without resorting to unnecessarily complex motion patterns. Similarly, humanoid robots should achieve smooth transitions between walking and running while maintaining natural and stable locomotion. However, unifying gait transition and multi-terrain adaptation within a single policy remains challenging due to gradient interference and the distribution shift induced by terrain-dependent visual and dynamic variations. Although Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures can alleviate multi-skill interference, naive joint training often fails to yield clear expert specialization, limiting their effectiveness. To address these challenges, we propose CoRe-MoE, a two-stage reinforcement learning framework that decouples gait generation from terrain adaptation. In the first stage, a stable locomotion policy is learned to produce natural walking and running behaviors with smooth transitions. In the second stage, a terrain-aware MoE branch is introduced and trained with a contrastive objective to shape the gating network, enabling it to capture structured terrain representations and promote expert specialization. The final action is obtained via weighted fusion of the base gait policy and the terrain-aware branch, allowing the policy to preserve stable locomotion patterns while adapting to complex terrains. Extensive simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms baseline approaches in terms of success rate, locomotion stability, and multi-terrain adaptability. Furthermore, zero-shot deployment on a Unitree G1 humanoid robot validates the effectiveness of our framework, achieving robust walking and running across stairs, slopes, steps, obstacles, and unstructured outdoor terrains, while maintaining accurate foothold placement and dynamic stability under external disturbances.

Taowen Wang, Zikang Xie, Bin Yang et al.

Humanoid robots promise whole-body interaction in human-centered environments, but scalable policy learning remains difficult because task-level decision-making and whole-body dynamic execution are tightly coupled. A practical solution is hierarchical control, where a high-level policy predicts intermediate whole-body actions and low-level general motion trackers (GMTs) execute them as stable humanoid motion. However, existing benchmarks rarely evaluate the policy-tracker interface itself, leaving open whether intermediate whole-body actions are executable, robust under task distribution shifts, and transferable across different GMT backends. We introduce HumanoidArena, a simulation-first benchmark for egocentric hierarchical whole-body learning. The benchmark formulates policy learning as a hierarchical decision making problem: a high-level policy converts egocentric vision, proprioception, and instructions into a compact whole-body action, which is subsequently executed by a low-level GMT. Instead of treating the legs as planar transport tools, HumanoidArena emphasizes interactions where lower-body coordination is structurally necessary in task completion. We therefore design 7 leg-critical HOI/HSI tasks in which success requires foot placement, balance maintenance, posture adjustment, and whole-body reorientation. To further diagnose the hierarchical system, we evaluate policies from two complementary perspectives: perturbation-conditioned generalization and GMT-conditioned transfer. Experiments show that hierarchical control enables learned policies to solve diverse leg-critical interactions, but performance is strongly tracker-conditioned and cross-GMT transfer remains fragile. These results position HumanoidArena as a benchmark for studying transferable intermediate action representations and scalable egocentric whole-body policy learning.