Zongjun Yang

Zongjun Yang, Rachitesh Kumar, Christian Kroer

We study online fair allocation of $T$ sequentially arriving items among $n$ agents with heterogeneous preferences, with the objective of maximizing generalized-mean welfare, defined as the $p$-mean of agents' time-averaged utilities, with $p\in (-\infty, 1)$. We first consider the i.i.d. arrival model and show that the pure greedy algorithm -- which myopically chooses the welfare-maximizing integral allocation -- achieves $\widetilde{O}(1/T)$ average regret. Importantly, in contrast to prior work, our algorithm does not require distributional knowledge and achieves the optimal regret rate using only the online samples. We then go beyond i.i.d. arrivals and investigate a nonstationary model with time-varying independent distributions. In the absence of additional data about the distributions, it is known that every online algorithm must suffer $Ω(1)$ average regret. We show that only a single historical sample from each distribution is sufficient to recover the optimal $\widetilde{O}(1/T)$ average regret rate, even in the face of arbitrary non-stationarity. Our algorithms are based on the re-solving paradigm: they assume that the remaining items will be the ones seen historically in those periods and solve the resulting welfare-maximization problem to determine the decision in every period. Finally, we also account for distribution shifts that may distort the fidelity of historical samples and show that the performance of our re-solving algorithms is robust to such shifts.

Bhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Christian Kroer, Ruta Mehta et al.

In this paper, we study a two-sided labor market that couples the classical Fisher market with goods and the Fisher market with bads into a single unified framework. In our model, users demand tasks in order to derive utility, while workers supply labor to perform these tasks in exchange for earnings. Each task thus plays a dual role: it is a good for the user side of the market and a chore for the worker side. Given prices for tasks, users choose utility-maximizing bundles subject to budgets, while workers choose disutility-minimizing task bundles subject to earning requirements; the resulting choices induce demand and supply endogenously for each task, and a CE corresponds to prices at which these coincide. We show that such markets are guaranteed to admit a CE in a very general setting, and the first and second welfare theorems hold for our labor market model. We next study the computation of equilibria under linear preferences. We show that, similar to the chores setting, equilibria correspond to KKT points of an Eisenberg-Gale-like non-convex program. Despite the non-convex characterization, we go on to show a set of surprisingly positive results. First, we show that there exists a polynomial-time combinatorial algorithm for computing CE, which relies on a natural Walrasian scheme for updating prices. In the "CEEI-like" case, this yields a strongly polynomial-time algorithm. We next show that our market admits a natural dual program, and this non-convex labor-market program admits a change of variables that transforms it into a linear program (albeit with irrational coefficients). Finally, leveraging this LP, we give yet another polynomial-time algorithm while deriving an approach for addressing the irrational coefficients in an efficient manner. We note that, even for goods-only linear Fisher markets, obtaining such an LP formulation remains open.