Tushar Anand

Maheswar Bora, Tushar Anand, Saurabh Atreya et al.

In this work we propose a Visual Mamba (ViM) based architecture, to dissolve the existing trade-off for real-time and accurate model with low computation overhead for disparity map generation (DMG). Moreover, we proposed a performance measure that can jointly evaluate the inference speed, computation overhead and the accurateness of a DMG model. The code implementation and corresponding models are available at: https://github.com/MBora/ViM-Disparity.

Tushar Anand, Advik Sinha, Abhijit Das

In this work, we propose an accurate and real-time optical flow and disparity estimation model by fusing pairwise input images in the proposed non-causal selective state space for dense perception tasks. We propose a non-causal Mamba block-based model that is fast and efficient and aptly manages the constraints present in a real-time applications. Our proposed model reduces inference times while maintaining high accuracy and low GPU usage for optical flow and disparity map generation. The results and analysis, and validation in real-life scenario justify that our proposed model can be used for unified real-time and accurate 3D dense perception estimation tasks. The code, along with the models, can be found at https://github.com/vimstereo/DensePerceptNCSSD

Mohammed Safi Ur Rahman Khan, Sanjay Suryanarayanan, Tushar Anand et al.

Large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are increasingly used to evaluate outputs of other models, for image-to-text (I2T) tasks such as visual question answering, and text-to-image (T2I) generation tasks. Despite this growing reliance, the reliability of these Evaluator VLMs remains under explored. In this work, we systematically evaluate the reliability of Evaluator VLMs across both I2T and T2I tasks. We introduce targeted perturbations that degrade output quality along key error dimensions, including object hallucinations, spatial reasoning, factual grounding, and visual fidelity. These perturbations test whether Evaluator VLMs can reliably account for these quality degrading errors in their evaluations. Using a comprehensive benchmark of over 4000 perturbed instances spanning 40 perturbation dimensions, we evaluate 4 prominent VLMs using single-answer scoring, pairwise comparison, and reference-guided paradigms. Our findings reveal that current VLM evaluators exhibit substantial blind spots: they often fail to detect perturbed outputs - in some cases exceeding 50%, struggle particularly with fine-grained compositional and spatial errors, and are often insensitive to hallucinated content that contradicts the input image. Pairwise comparison proves more reliable, though failure rates persist. These results highlight the unreliable nature of current Evaluator VLMs and urge caution in their deployment for benchmarking and development decisions. Code and data have been made publicly available.