Chieh-Chi Yang

Chien-yu Huang, Wei-Chih Chen, Shu-wen Yang et al. · cmu, mit

Multimodal foundation models, such as Gemini and ChatGPT, have revolutionized human-machine interactions by seamlessly integrating various forms of data. Developing a universal spoken language model that comprehends a wide range of natural language instructions is critical for bridging communication gaps and facilitating more intuitive interactions. However, the absence of a comprehensive evaluation benchmark poses a significant challenge. We present Dynamic-SUPERB Phase-2, an open and evolving benchmark for the comprehensive evaluation of instruction-based universal speech models. Building upon the first generation, this second version incorporates 125 new tasks contributed collaboratively by the global research community, expanding the benchmark to a total of 180 tasks, making it the largest benchmark for speech and audio evaluation. While the first generation of Dynamic-SUPERB was limited to classification tasks, Dynamic-SUPERB Phase-2 broadens its evaluation capabilities by introducing a wide array of novel and diverse tasks, including regression and sequence generation, across speech, music, and environmental audio. Evaluation results show that no model performed well universally. SALMONN-13B excelled in English ASR and Qwen2-Audio-7B-Instruct showed high accuracy in emotion recognition, but current models still require further innovations to handle a broader range of tasks. We open-source all task data and the evaluation pipeline at https://github.com/dynamic-superb/dynamic-superb.

Chieh-Chi Yang, Yu-Hsiang Chen, Yi-Ting Chen

Natural-language instructions promise controllable end-to-end driving, but their benefit can be hidden when planners already receive reliable high-level commands. We propose NudgeVAD, a frozen-planner residual framework that uses language as a calibrated nudge to a VAD trajectory. With identity-initialized FiLM and a zero-initialized residual head, NudgeVAD is equivalent to the frozen planner at initialization, so learned deviations arise only from language-conditioned residuals. We evaluate NudgeVAD along a command-reliability axis. With reliable commands, language improves the initial planner but becomes nearly redundant once compared against VAD-FT (UNCOND), a compute-matched VAD model fine-tuned without language. With random commands, however, language becomes essential: detaching text degrades ADE6s to 3.166 m, while NudgeVAD with text recovers 2.806 m and outperforms VAD-FT (UNCOND) by 0.312 m. These results show that language is not universally additive; it is most valuable when the categorical command channel is unreliable.

Chi-Hsi Kung, Chieh-Chi Yang, Pang-Yuan Pao et al.

Intelligent driving systems aim to achieve a zero-collision mobility experience, requiring interdisciplinary efforts to enhance safety performance. This work focuses on risk identification, the process of identifying and analyzing risks stemming from dynamic traffic participants and unexpected events. While significant advances have been made in the community, the current evaluation of different risk identification algorithms uses independent datasets, leading to difficulty in direct comparison and hindering collective progress toward safety performance enhancement. To address this limitation, we introduce \textbf{RiskBench}, a large-scale scenario-based benchmark for risk identification. We design a scenario taxonomy and augmentation pipeline to enable a systematic collection of ground truth risks under diverse scenarios. We assess the ability of ten algorithms to (1) detect and locate risks, (2) anticipate risks, and (3) facilitate decision-making. We conduct extensive experiments and summarize future research on risk identification. Our aim is to encourage collaborative endeavors in achieving a society with zero collisions. We have made our dataset and benchmark toolkit publicly on the project page: https://hcis-lab.github.io/RiskBench/