Bowen Zhou

David Puljiz, Bowen Zhou, Ke Ma et al.

Human teams exhibit both implicit and explicit intention sharing. To further development of human-robot collaboration, intention recognition is crucial on both sides. Present approaches rely on a vast sensor suite on and around the robot to achieve intention recognition. This relegates intuitive human-robot collaboration purely to such bulky systems, which are inadequate for large-scale, real-world scenarios due to their complexity and cost. In this paper we propose an intention recognition system that is based purely on a portable head-mounted display. In addition robot intention visualisation is also supported. We present experiments to show the quality of our human goal estimation component and some basic interactions with an industrial robot. HAIR should raise the quality of interaction between robots and humans, instead of such interactions raising the hair on the necks of the human coworkers.

Ming Tu, Yun Tang, Jing Huang et al.

Speech emotion recognition (SER) has attracted great attention in recent years due to the high demand for emotionally intelligent speech interfaces. Deriving speaker-invariant representations for speech emotion recognition is crucial. In this paper, we propose to apply adversarial training to SER to learn speaker-invariant representations. Our model consists of three parts: a representation learning sub-network with time-delay neural network (TDNN) and LSTM with statistical pooling, an emotion classification network and a speaker classification network. Both the emotion and speaker classification network take the output of the representation learning network as input. Two training strategies are employed: one based on domain adversarial training (DAT) and the other one based on cross-gradient training (CGT). Besides the conventional data set, we also evaluate our proposed models on a much larger publicly available emotion data set with 250 speakers. Evaluation results show that on IEMOCAP, DAT and CGT provides 5.6% and 7.4% improvement respectively, over a baseline system without speaker-invariant representation learning on 5-fold cross validation. On the larger emotion data set, while CGT fails to yield better results than baseline, DAT can still provide 9.8% relative improvement on a standalone test set.