Md Mohaiminul Islam

Yulu Pan, Han Yi, Seongsu Ha et al.

True video intelligence demands more than recognizing what is visible: it requires reasoning about why events unfold, predicting what would change under different conditions, and deciding what to do next. We refer to this progression, from perception through causal reasoning and simulation to strategic planning, as Strategic Video Intelligence (SVI). No existing benchmark evaluates this capability stack: in-the-wild videos lack verifiable ground truth for causal and strategic questions, while synthetic environments sacrifice the complexity of real multi-agent systems. To bridge this gap, we introduce SVI-Bench, a large-scale benchmark that leverages team sports as a dynamic microworld, combining the complexity of real-world multi-agent interaction (10-22 agents making coordinated decisions under adversarial pressure) with the verifiability of explicit rules and definitive outcomes. SVI-Bench comprises approximately 35K hours of broadcast video, 15M annotated actions, 15K hours of expert commentary, 23K game reports, and 103K structured statistical records across basketball, soccer, and hockey, all constructed via a data engine that transforms raw game data into a dense, cross-referenced corpus. We organize evaluation into 9 tasks spanning a progressive four-pillar hierarchy: Dynamic Scene Understanding, Causal Reasoning, Strategic Simulation, and Agentic Synthesis. Evaluating strong multimodal and agentic baselines, we find a capability cliff: models perform competently on perceptual tasks, achieving approximately 73% on fine-grained action QA, but degrade sharply at each successive cognitive level. Agentic tasks prove hardest: the strongest model achieves only 5% accuracy when required to autonomously gather and integrate evidence across a corpus of 1.8M clips.

Md. Saiful Bari Siddiqui, Md Mohaiminul Islam, Md. Golam Rabiul Alam

Overfitting remains a significant challenge in deep learning, often arising from data outliers, noise, and limited training data. To address this, the Divide2Conquer (D2C) method was previously proposed, which partitions training data into multiple subsets and trains identical models independently on each. This strategy enables learning more consistent patterns while minimizing the influence of individual outliers and noise. However, D2C's standard aggregation typically treats all subset models equally or based on fixed heuristics (like data size), potentially underutilizing information about their varying generalization capabilities. Building upon this foundation, we introduce Dynamic Uncertainty-Aware Divide2Conquer (DUA-D2C), an advanced technique that refines the aggregation process. DUA-D2C dynamically weights the contributions of subset models based on their performance on a shared validation set, considering both accuracy and prediction uncertainty. This intelligent aggregation allows the central model to preferentially learn from subsets yielding more generalizable and confident edge models, thereby more effectively combating overfitting. Empirical evaluations on benchmark datasets spanning multiple domains demonstrate that DUA-D2C significantly improves generalization. Our analysis includes evaluations of decision boundaries, loss curves, and other performance metrics, highlighting the effectiveness of DUA-D2C. This study demonstrates that DUA-D2C improves generalization performance even when applied on top of other regularization methods, establishing it as a theoretically grounded and effective approach to combating overfitting in modern deep learning. Our codes are publicly available at: https://github.com/Saiful185/DUA-D2C.