Christian Fiedler

Christian Fiedler, Michael Herty, Michael Rom et al.

Kernel methods, being supported by a well-developed theory and coming with efficient algorithms, are among the most popular and successful machine learning techniques. From a mathematical point of view, these methods rest on the concept of kernels and function spaces generated by kernels, so called reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces. Motivated by recent developments of learning approaches in the context of interacting particle systems, we investigate kernel methods acting on data with many measurement variables. We show the rigorous mean field limit of kernels and provide a detailed analysis of the limiting reproducing kernel Hilbert space. Furthermore, several examples of kernels, that allow a rigorous mean field limit, are presented.

Christian Fiedler

Reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces (RKHSs) are very important function spaces, playing an important role in machine learning, statistics, numerical analysis and pure mathematics. Since Lipschitz and Hölder continuity are important regularity properties, with many applications in interpolation, approximation and optimization problems, in this work we investigate these continuity notion in RKHSs. We provide several sufficient conditions as well as an in depth investigation of reproducing kernels inducing prescribed Lipschitz or Hölder continuity. Apart from new results, we also collect related known results from the literature, making the present work also a convenient reference on this topic.

Christian Fiedler, Michael Herty, Sebastian Trimpe

In many applications of machine learning, a large number of variables are considered. Motivated by machine learning of interacting particle systems, we consider the situation when the number of input variables goes to infinity. First, we continue the recent investigation of the mean field limit of kernels and their reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces, completing the existing theory. Next, we provide results relevant for approximation with such kernels in the mean field limit, including a representer theorem. Finally, we use these kernels in the context of statistical learning in the mean field limit, focusing on Support Vector Machines. In particular, we show mean field convergence of empirical and infinite-sample solutions as well as the convergence of the corresponding risks. On the one hand, our results establish rigorous mean field limits in the context of kernel methods, providing new theoretical tools and insights for large-scale problems. On the other hand, our setting corresponds to a new form of limit of learning problems, which seems to have not been investigated yet in the statistical learning theory literature.

Abdullah Tokmak, Christian Fiedler, Melanie N. Zeilinger et al.

Safety guarantees are vital in many control applications, such as robotics. Model predictive control (MPC) provides a constructive framework for controlling safety-critical systems, but is limited by its computational complexity. We address this problem by presenting a novel algorithm that automatically computes an explicit approximation to nonlinear MPC schemes while retaining closed-loop guarantees. Specifically, the problem can be reduced to a function approximation problem, which we then tackle by proposing ALKIA-X, the Adaptive and Localized Kernel Interpolation Algorithm with eXtrapolated reproducing kernel Hilbert space norm. ALKIA-X is a non-iterative algorithm that ensures numerically well-conditioned computations, a fast-to-evaluate approximating function, and the guaranteed satisfaction of any desired bound on the approximation error. Hence, ALKIA-X automatically computes an explicit function that approximates the MPC, yielding a controller suitable for safety-critical systems and high sampling rates. We apply ALKIA-X to approximate two nonlinear MPC schemes, demonstrating reduced computational demand and applicability to realistic problems.

Christian Fiedler

In supervised learning with distributional inputs in the two-stage sampling setup, relevant to applications like learning-based medical screening or causal learning, the inputs (which are probability distributions) are not accessible in the learning phase, but only samples thereof. This problem is particularly amenable to kernel-based learning methods, where the distributions or samples are first embedded into a Hilbert space, often using kernel mean embeddings (KMEs), and then a standard kernel method like Support Vector Machines (SVMs) is applied, using a kernel defined on the embedding Hilbert space. In this work, we contribute to the theoretical analysis of this latter approach, with a particular focus on classification with distributional inputs using SVMs. We establish a new oracle inequality and derive consistency and learning rate results. Furthermore, for SVMs using the hinge loss and Gaussian kernels, we formulate a novel variant of an established noise assumption from the binary classification literature, under which we can establish learning rates. Finally, some of our technical tools like a new feature space for Gaussian kernels on Hilbert spaces are of independent interest.

Pierre-François Massiani, Christian Fiedler, Lukas Haverbeck et al.

We propose a framework for hypothesis testing on conditional probability distributions, which we then use to construct statistical tests of functionals of conditional distributions. These tests identify the inputs where the functionals differ with high probability, and include tests of conditional moments or two-sample tests. Our key idea is to transform confidence bounds of a learning method into a test of conditional expectations. We instantiate this principle for kernel ridge regression (KRR) with subgaussian noise. An intermediate data embedding then enables more general tests -- including conditional two-sample tests -- via kernel mean embeddings of distributions. To have guarantees in this setting, we generalize existing pointwise-in-time or time-uniform confidence bounds for KRR to previously-inaccessible yet essential cases such as infinite-dimensional outputs with non-trace-class kernels. These bounds also circumvent the need for independent data, allowing for instance online sampling. To make our tests readily applicable in practice, we introduce bootstrapping schemes leveraging the parametric form of testing thresholds identified in theory to avoid tuning inaccessible parameters. We illustrate the tests on examples, including one in process monitoring and comparison of dynamical systems. Overall, our results establish a comprehensive foundation for conditional testing on functionals, from theoretical guarantees to an algorithmic implementation, and advance the state of the art on confidence bounds for vector-valued least squares estimation.

Christian Fiedler, Johanna Menn, Lukas Kreisköther et al.

Optimizing an unknown function under safety constraints is a central task in robotics, biomedical engineering, and many other disciplines, and increasingly safe Bayesian Optimization (BO) is used for this. Due to the safety critical nature of these applications, it is of utmost importance that theoretical safety guarantees for these algorithms translate into the real world. In this work, we investigate three safety-related issues of the popular class of SafeOpt-type algorithms. First, these algorithms critically rely on frequentist uncertainty bounds for Gaussian Process (GP) regression, but concrete implementations typically utilize heuristics that invalidate all safety guarantees. We provide a detailed analysis of this problem and introduce Real-\b{eta}-SafeOpt, a variant of the SafeOpt algorithm that leverages recent GP bounds and thus retains all theoretical guarantees. Second, we identify assuming an upper bound on the reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) norm of the target function, a key technical assumption in SafeOpt-like algorithms, as a central obstacle to real-world usage. To overcome this challenge, we introduce the Lipschitz-only Safe Bayesian Optimization (LoSBO) algorithm, which guarantees safety without an assumption on the RKHS bound, and empirically show that this algorithm is not only safe, but also exhibits superior performance compared to the state-of-the-art on several function classes. Third, SafeOpt and derived algorithms rely on a discrete search space, making them difficult to apply to higher-dimensional problems. To widen the applicability of these algorithms, we introduce Lipschitz-only GP-UCB (LoS-GP-UCB), a variant of LoSBO applicable to moderately high-dimensional problems, while retaining safety.

Christian Fiedler, Carsten W. Scherer, Sebastian Trimpe

The combination of machine learning with control offers many opportunities, in particular for robust control. However, due to strong safety and reliability requirements in many real-world applications, providing rigorous statistical and control-theoretic guarantees is of utmost importance, yet difficult to achieve for learning-based control schemes. We present a general framework for learning-enhanced robust control that allows for systematic integration of prior engineering knowledge, is fully compatible with modern robust control and still comes with rigorous and practically meaningful guarantees. Building on the established Linear Fractional Representation and Integral Quadratic Constraints framework, we integrate Gaussian Process Regression as a learning component and state-of-the-art robust controller synthesis. In a concrete robust control example, our approach is demonstrated to yield improved performance with more data, while guarantees are maintained throughout.

Christian Fiedler, Carsten W. Scherer, Sebastian Trimpe

Gaussian Process Regression is a popular nonparametric regression method based on Bayesian principles that provides uncertainty estimates for its predictions. However, these estimates are of a Bayesian nature, whereas for some important applications, like learning-based control with safety guarantees, frequentist uncertainty bounds are required. Although such rigorous bounds are available for Gaussian Processes, they are too conservative to be useful in applications. This often leads practitioners to replacing these bounds by heuristics, thus breaking all theoretical guarantees. To address this problem, we introduce new uncertainty bounds that are rigorous, yet practically useful at the same time. In particular, the bounds can be explicitly evaluated and are much less conservative than state of the art results. Furthermore, we show that certain model misspecifications lead to only graceful degradation. We demonstrate these advantages and the usefulness of our results for learning-based control with numerical examples.

Friedrich Solowjow, Dominik Baumann, Christian Fiedler et al.

Evaluating whether data streams are drawn from the same distribution is at the heart of various machine learning problems. This is particularly relevant for data generated by dynamical systems since such systems are essential for many real-world processes in biomedical, economic, or engineering systems. While kernel two-sample tests are powerful for comparing independent and identically distributed random variables, no established method exists for comparing dynamical systems. The main problem is the inherently violated independence assumption. We propose a two-sample test for dynamical systems by addressing three core challenges: we (i) introduce a novel notion of mixing that captures autocorrelations in a relevant metric, (ii) propose an efficient way to estimate the speed of mixing relying purely on data, and (iii) integrate these into established kernel two-sample tests. The result is a data-driven method that is straightforward to use in practice and comes with sound theoretical guarantees. In an example application to anomaly detection from human walking data, we show that the test is readily applicable without any human expert knowledge and feature engineering.