Victor Ferrari

Victor Ferrari, Rafael Sousa, Marcio Pereira et al.

Convolution is one of the most computationally intensive operations that must be performed for machine-learning model inference. A traditional approach to compute convolutions is known as the Im2Col + BLAS method. This paper proposes SConv: a direct-convolution algorithm based on a MLIR/LLVM code-generation toolchain that can be integrated into machine-learning compilers . This algorithm introduces: (a) Convolution Slicing Analysis (CSA) - a convolution-specific 3D cache-blocking analysis pass that focuses on tile reuse over the cache hierarchy; (b) Convolution Slicing Optimization (CSO) - a code-generation pass that uses CSA to generate a tiled direct-convolution macro-kernel; and (c) Vector-Based Packing (VBP) - an architecture-specific optimized input-tensor packing solution based on vector-register shift instructions for convolutions with unitary stride. Experiments conducted on 393 convolutions from full ONNX-MLIR machine-learning models indicate that the elimination of the Im2Col transformation and the use of fast packing routines result in a total packing time reduction, on full model inference, of 2.0x - 3.9x on Intel x86 and 3.6x - 7.2x on IBM POWER10. The speed-up over an Im2Col + BLAS method based on current BLAS implementations for end-to-end machine-learning model inference is in the range of 9% - 25% for Intel x86 and 10% - 42% for IBM POWER10 architectures. The total convolution speedup for model inference is 12% - 27% on Intel x86 and 26% - 46% on IBM POWER10. SConv also outperforms BLAS GEMM, when computing pointwise convolutions, in more than 83% of the 219 tested instances.

Lucas Alvarenga, Victor Ferrari, Rafael Souza et al.

Convolution is a compute-intensive operation placed at the heart of Convolution Neural Networks (CNNs). It has led to the development of many high-performance algorithms, such as Im2col-GEMM, Winograd, and Direct-Convolution. However, the comparison of different convolution algorithms is an error-prone task as it requires specific data layouts and system resources. Failure to address these requirements might lead to unwanted time penalties. Thus, considering all processing steps within convolution algorithms is essential to comprehensively evaluate and fairly compare their performance. Furthermore, most known convolution benchmarking adopts ad-hoc testing suites with limited coverage and handmade operations. This paper proposes ConvBench, a primitive-level benchmark for the evaluation and comparison of convolution algorithms. It assesses 9243 convolution operations derived from 1097 real-world deep learning models, resulting in performance and execution breakdown graphs for a detailed evaluation. ConvBench capability is evaluated across the Sliced Convolution (SConv) algorithm. The experiments showed results faster than Im2col-GEMM in 93.6% of the convolutions. However, the use of ConvBench allowed the delving into the remaining 6.4% underperforming convolutions, uncovering a critical slowdown of 79.5% on average of SConv's packing step. This analysis underscores a potential source of optimization for SConv, opening up new paths for convolution designers to improve their algorithms.