0.2CLDec 3, 2020
Circles are like Ellipses, or Ellipses are like Circles? Measuring the Degree of Asymmetry of Static and Contextual Embeddings and the Implications to Representation LearningWei Zhang, Murray Campbell, Yang Yu et al.
Human judgments of word similarity have been a popular method of evaluating the quality of word embedding. But it fails to measure the geometry properties such as asymmetry. For example, it is more natural to say "Ellipses are like Circles" than "Circles are like Ellipses". Such asymmetry has been observed from a psychoanalysis test called word evocation experiment, where one word is used to recall another. Although useful, such experimental data have been significantly understudied for measuring embedding quality. In this paper, we use three well-known evocation datasets to gain insights into asymmetry encoding of embedding. We study both static embedding as well as contextual embedding, such as BERT. Evaluating asymmetry for BERT is generally hard due to the dynamic nature of embedding. Thus, we probe BERT's conditional probabilities (as a language model) using a large number of Wikipedia contexts to derive a theoretically justifiable Bayesian asymmetry score. The result shows that contextual embedding shows randomness than static embedding on similarity judgments while performing well on asymmetry judgment, which aligns with its strong performance on "extrinsic evaluations" such as text classification. The asymmetry judgment and the Bayesian approach provides a new perspective to evaluate contextual embedding on intrinsic evaluation, and its comparison to similarity evaluation concludes our work with a discussion on the current state and the future of representation learning.
5.4LGOct 21, 2019
Signal Combination for Language IdentificationShengye Wang, Li Wan, Yang Yu et al.
Google's multilingual speech recognition system combines low-level acoustic signals with language-specific recognizer signals to better predict the language of an utterance. This paper presents our experience with different signal combination methods to improve overall language identification accuracy. We compare the performance of a lattice-based ensemble model and a deep neural network model to combine signals from recognizers with that of a baseline that only uses low-level acoustic signals. Experimental results show that the deep neural network model outperforms the lattice-based ensemble model, and it reduced the error rate from 5.5% in the baseline to 4.3%, which is a 21.8% relative reduction.
9.4MLMay 7, 2019
A Generative Model for Sampling High-Performance and Diverse Weights for Neural NetworksLior Deutsch, Erik Nijkamp, Yu Yang
Recent work on mode connectivity in the loss landscape of deep neural networks has demonstrated that the locus of (sub-)optimal weight vectors lies on continuous paths. In this work, we train a neural network that serves as a hypernetwork, mapping a latent vector into high-performance (low-loss) weight vectors, generalizing recent findings of mode connectivity to higher dimensional manifolds. We formulate the training objective as a compromise between accuracy and diversity, where the diversity takes into account trivial symmetry transformations of the target network. We demonstrate how to reduce the number of parameters in the hypernetwork by parameter sharing. Once learned, the hypernetwork allows for a computationally efficient, ancestral sampling of neural network weights, which we recruit to form large ensembles. The improvement in classification accuracy obtained by this ensembling indicates that the generated manifold extends in dimensions other than directions implied by trivial symmetries. For computational efficiency, we distill an ensemble into a single classifier while retaining generalization.
6.6ASNov 29, 2018
Tuplemax Loss for Language IdentificationLi Wan, Prashant Sridhar, Yang Yu et al.
In many scenarios of a language identification task, the user will specify a small set of languages which he/she can speak instead of a large set of all possible languages. We want to model such prior knowledge into the way we train our neural networks, by replacing the commonly used softmax loss function with a novel loss function named tuplemax loss. As a matter of fact, a typical language identification system launched in North America has about 95% users who could speak no more than two languages. Using the tuplemax loss, our system achieved a 2.33% error rate, which is a relative 39.4% improvement over the 3.85% error rate of standard softmax loss method.
1.1CLAug 19, 2015
Recognizing Extended Spatiotemporal Expressions by Actively Trained Average Perceptron EnsemblesWei Zhang, Yang Yu, Osho Gupta et al.
Precise geocoding and time normalization for text requires that location and time phrases be identified. Many state-of-the-art geoparsers and temporal parsers suffer from low recall. Categories commonly missed by parsers are: nouns used in a non- spatiotemporal sense, adjectival and adverbial phrases, prepositional phrases, and numerical phrases. We collected and annotated data set by querying commercial web searches API with such spatiotemporal expressions as were missed by state-of-the- art parsers. Due to the high cost of sentence annotation, active learning was used to label training data, and a new strategy was designed to better select training examples to reduce labeling cost. For the learning algorithm, we applied an average perceptron trained Featurized Hidden Markov Model (FHMM). Five FHMM instances were used to create an ensemble, with the output phrase selected by voting. Our ensemble model was tested on a range of sequential labeling tasks, and has shown competitive performance. Our contributions include (1) an new dataset annotated with named entities and expanded spatiotemporal expressions; (2) a comparison of inference algorithms for ensemble models showing the superior accuracy of Belief Propagation over Viterbi Decoding; (3) a new example re-weighting method for active ensemble learning that 'memorizes' the latest examples trained; (4) a spatiotemporal parser that jointly recognizes expanded spatiotemporal expressions as well as named entities.