CVNov 3, 2024Code
A New Logic For Pediatric Brain Tumor SegmentationMax Bengtsson, Elif Keles, Gorkem Durak et al.
In this paper, we present a novel approach for segmenting pediatric brain tumors using a deep learning architecture, inspired by expert radiologists' segmentation strategies. Our model delineates four distinct tumor labels and is benchmarked on a held-out PED BraTS 2024 test set (i.e., pediatric brain tumor datasets introduced by BraTS). Furthermore, we evaluate our model's performance against the state-of-the-art (SOTA) model using a new external dataset of 30 patients from CBTN (Children's Brain Tumor Network), labeled in accordance with the PED BraTS 2024 guidelines and 2023 BraTS Adult Glioma dataset. We compare segmentation outcomes with the winning algorithm from the PED BraTS 2023 challenge as the SOTA model. Our proposed algorithm achieved an average Dice score of 0.642 and an HD95 of 73.0 mm on the CBTN test data, outperforming the SOTA model, which achieved a Dice score of 0.626 and an HD95 of 84.0 mm. Moreover, our model exhibits strong generalizability, attaining a 0.877 Dice score in whole tumor segmentation on the BraTS 2023 Adult Glioma dataset, surpassing existing SOTA. Our results indicate that the proposed model is a step towards providing more accurate segmentation for pediatric brain tumors, which is essential for evaluating therapy response and monitoring patient progress. Our source code is available at https://github.com/NUBagciLab/Pediatric-Brain-Tumor-Segmentation-Model.
LGApr 8, 2019
Relational Reasoning Network (RRN) for Anatomical LandmarkingNeslisah Torosdagli, Syed Anwar, Payal Verma et al.
Purpose: We perform anatomical landmarking for craniomaxillofacial (CMF) bones without explicitly segmenting them. Towards this, we propose a new simple yet efficient deep network architecture, called \textit{relational reasoning network (RRN)}, to accurately learn the local and the global relations among the landmarks in CMF bones; specifically, mandible, maxilla, and nasal bones. Approach: The proposed RRN works in an end-to-end manner, utilizing learned relations of the landmarks based on dense-block units. For a given few landmarks as input, RRN treats the landmarking process similar to a data imputation problem where predicted landmarks are considered missing. Results: We applied RRN to cone beam computed tomography scans obtained from 250 patients. With a 4-fold cross validation technique, we obtained an average root mean squared error of less than 2 mm per landmark. Our proposed RRN has revealed unique relationships among the landmarks that help us in inferring several \textit{reasoning} about informativeness of the landmark points. The proposed system identifies the missing landmark locations accurately even when severe pathology or deformation are present in the bones. Conclusions: Accurately identifying anatomical landmarks is a crucial step in deformation analysis and surgical planning for CMF surgeries. Achieving this goal without the need for explicit bone segmentation addresses a major limitation of segmentation based approaches, where segmentation failure (as often the case in bones with severe pathology or deformation) could easily lead to incorrect landmarking. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first of its kind algorithm finding anatomical relations of the objects using deep learning.