Jae-Chang Kim

Yunjoo Lee, Jaechang Kim, Jungseul Ok

We address a practical scenario of anomaly detection for industrial sound data, where the sound of a target machine is corrupted by background noise and interference from neighboring machines. Overcoming this challenge is difficult since the interference is often virtually indistinguishable from the target machine without additional information. To address the issue, we propose SSAD, a framework of source separation (SS) followed by anomaly detection (AD), which leverages machine activity information, often readily available in practical settings. SSAD consists of two components: (i) activity-informed SS, enabling effective source separation even given interference with similar timbre, and (ii) two-step masking, robustifying anomaly detection by emphasizing anomalies aligned with the machine activity. Our experiments demonstrate that SSAD achieves comparable accuracy to a baseline with full access to clean signals, while SSAD is provided only a corrupted signal and activity information. In addition, thanks to the activity-informed SS and AD with the two-step masking, SSAD outperforms standard approaches, particularly in cases with interference. It highlights the practical efficacy of SSAD in addressing the complexities of anomaly detection in industrial sound data.

Sungjae Lee, Hyejin Park, Jaechang Kim et al.

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable potential in various complex tasks requiring multi-step reasoning methods like tree search to explore diverse reasoning paths. However, existing methods often suffer from computational inefficiency and redundancy. First, they overlook the diversity of task difficulties, leading to unnecessarily extensive searches even for easy tasks. Second, they neglect the semantics of reasoning paths, resulting in redundant exploration of semantically identical paths. To address these limitations, we propose Semantic Exploration with Adaptive Gating (SEAG), a computationally efficient method. SEAG employs an adaptive gating mechanism that dynamically decides whether to conduct a tree search, based on the confidence level of answers from a preceding simple reasoning method. Furthermore, its tree-based exploration consolidates semantically identical reasoning steps, reducing redundant explorations while maintaining or even improving accuracy. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that SEAG significantly improves accuracy by 4.3% on average while requiring only 31% of computational costs compared to existing tree search-based methods on complex reasoning benchmarks including GSM8K and ARC with diverse language models such as Llama2, Llama3, and Mistral. Our code is available at https://github.com/ml-postech/SEAG-semantic-exploration-with-adaptive-gating .

Jaechang Kim, Jinmin Goh, Inseok Hwang et al.

Deep learning-based expert models have reached superhuman performance in decision-making domains such as chess and Go. However, it is under-explored to explain or comment on given decisions although it is important for model explainability and human education. The outputs of expert models are accurate, but yet difficult to interpret for humans. On the other hand, large language models (LLMs) can produce fluent commentary but are prone to hallucinations due to their limited decision-making capabilities. To bridge this gap between expert models and LLMs, we focus on chess commentary as a representative task of explaining complex decision-making processes through language and address both the generation and evaluation of commentary. We introduce Concept-guided Chess Commentary generation (CCC) for producing commentary and GPT-based Chess Commentary Evaluation (GCC-Eval) for assessing it. CCC integrates the decision-making strengths of expert models with the linguistic fluency of LLMs through prioritized, concept-based explanations. GCC-Eval leverages expert knowledge to evaluate chess commentary based on informativeness and linguistic quality. Experimental results, validated by both human judges and GCC-Eval, demonstrate that CCC generates commentary which is accurate, informative, and fluent.