Zhuqing Liu

Baolei Zhang, Haoran Xin, Jiatong Li et al.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has proven effective in mitigating hallucinations in large language models by incorporating external knowledge during inference. However, this integration introduces new security vulnerabilities, particularly to poisoning attacks. Although prior work has explored various poisoning strategies, a thorough assessment of their practical threat to RAG systems remains missing. To address this gap, we propose the first comprehensive benchmark framework for evaluating poisoning attacks on RAG. Our benchmark covers 5 standard question answering (QA) datasets and 10 expanded variants, along with 13 poisoning attack methods and 7 defense mechanisms, representing a broad spectrum of existing techniques. Using this benchmark, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of all included attacks and defenses across the full dataset spectrum. Our findings show that while existing attacks perform well on standard QA datasets, their effectiveness drops significantly on the expanded versions. Moreover, our results demonstrate that various advanced RAG architectures, such as sequential, branching, conditional, and loop RAG, as well as multi-turn conversational RAG, multimodal RAG systems, and RAG-based LLM agent systems, remain susceptible to poisoning attacks. Notably, current defense techniques fail to provide robust protection, underscoring the pressing need for more resilient and generalizable defense strategies.

Wenbin Wang, Qiwen Ma, Zifan Zhang et al.

Federated learning allows multiple clients to collaboratively train a global model with the assistance of a server. However, its distributed nature makes it susceptible to poisoning attacks, where malicious clients can compromise the global model by sending harmful local model updates to the server. To unlearn an accurate global model from a poisoned one after identifying malicious clients, federated unlearning has been introduced. Yet, current research on federated unlearning has primarily concentrated on its effectiveness and efficiency, overlooking the security challenges it presents. In this work, we bridge the gap via proposing BadUnlearn, the first poisoning attacks targeting federated unlearning. In BadUnlearn, malicious clients send specifically designed local model updates to the server during the unlearning process, aiming to ensure that the resulting unlearned model remains poisoned. To mitigate these threats, we propose UnlearnGuard, a robust federated unlearning framework that is provably robust against both existing poisoning attacks and our BadUnlearn. The core concept of UnlearnGuard is for the server to estimate the clients' local model updates during the unlearning process and employ a filtering strategy to verify the accuracy of these estimations. Theoretically, we prove that the model unlearned through UnlearnGuard closely resembles one obtained by train-from-scratch. Empirically, we show that BadUnlearn can effectively corrupt existing federated unlearning methods, while UnlearnGuard remains secure against poisoning attacks.

Harsh Kasyap, Minghong Fang, Zhuqing Liu et al.

Federated learning (FL) is a privacy-preserving machine learning technique that facilitates collaboration among participants across demographics. FL enables model sharing, while restricting the movement of data. Since FL provides participants with independence over their training data, it becomes susceptible to poisoning attacks. Such collaboration also propagates bias among the participants, even unintentionally, due to different data distribution or historical bias present in the data. This paper proposes an intentional fairness attack, where a client maliciously sends a biased model, by increasing the fairness loss while training, even considering homogeneous data distribution. The fairness loss is calculated by solving an optimization problem for fairness metrics such as demographic parity and equalized odds. The attack is insidious and hard to detect, as it maintains global accuracy even after increasing the bias. We evaluate our attack against the state-of-the-art Byzantine-robust and fairness-aware aggregation schemes over different datasets, in various settings. The empirical results demonstrate the attack efficacy by increasing the bias up to 90\%, even in the presence of a single malicious client in the FL system.