B. Joachimi

Euclid Collaboration, X. Xu, R. Chen et al.

We present an end-to-end, iterative pipeline for efficient identification of strong galaxy--galaxy lensing systems, applied to the Euclid Q1 imaging data. Starting from VIS catalogues, we reject point sources, apply a magnitude cut (I$_E$ $\leq$ 24) on deflectors, and run a pixel-level artefact/noise filter to build 96 $\times$ 96 pix cutouts; VIS+NISP colour composites are constructed with a VIS-anchored luminance scheme that preserves VIS morphology and NISP colour contrast. A VIS-only seed classifier supplies clear positives and typical impostors, from which we curate a morphology-balanced negative set and augment scarce positives. Among the six CNNs studied initially, a modified VGG16 (GlobalAveragePooling + 256/128 dense layers with the last nine layers trainable) performs best; the training set grows from 27 seed lenses (augmented to 1809) plus 2000 negatives to a colour dataset of 30,686 images. After three rounds of iterative fine-tuning, human grading of the top 4000 candidates ranked by the final model yields 441 Grade A/B candidate lensing systems, including 311 overlapping with the existing Q1 strong-lens catalogue, and 130 additional A/B candidates (9 As and 121 Bs) not previously reported. Independently, the model recovers 740 out of 905 (81.8%) candidate Q1 lenses within its top 20,000 predictions, considering off-centred samples. Candidates span I$_E$ $\simeq$ 17--24 AB mag (median 21.3 AB mag) and are redder in Y$_E$--H$_E$ than the parent population, consistent with massive early-type deflectors. Each training iteration required a week for a small team, and the approach easily scales to future Euclid releases; future work will calibrate the selection function via lens injection, extend recall through uncertainty-aware active learning, explore multi-scale or attention-based neural networks with fast post-hoc vetters that incorporate lens models into the classification.

A. A. Saoulis, D. Piras, A. Spurio Mancini et al.

This paper presents a novel framework for full-waveform seismic source inversion using simulation-based inference (SBI). Traditional probabilistic approaches often rely on simplifying assumptions about data errors, which we show can lead to inaccurate uncertainty quantification. SBI addresses this limitation by building an empirical probabilistic model of the data errors using machine learning models, known as neural density estimators, which can then be integrated into the Bayesian inference framework. We apply the SBI framework to point-source moment tensor inversions as well as joint moment tensor and time-location inversions. We construct a range of synthetic examples to explore the quality of the SBI solutions, as well as to compare the SBI results with standard Gaussian likelihood-based Bayesian inversions. We then demonstrate that under real seismic noise, common Gaussian likelihood assumptions for treating full-waveform data yield overconfident posterior distributions that underestimate the moment tensor component uncertainties by up to a factor of 3. We contrast this with SBI, which produces well-calibrated posteriors that generally agree with the true seismic source parameters, and offers an order-of-magnitude reduction in the number of simulations required to perform inference compared to standard Monte Carlo techniques. Finally, we apply our methodology to a pair of moderate magnitude earthquakes in the North Atlantic. We utilise seismic waveforms recorded by the recent UPFLOW ocean bottom seismometer array as well as by regional land stations in the Azores, comparing full moment tensor and source-time location posteriors between SBI and a Gaussian likelihood approach. We find that our adaptation of SBI can be directly applied to real earthquake sources to efficiently produce high quality posterior distributions that significantly improve upon Gaussian likelihood approaches.