Chenghao Liu

Xinru Zhang, Ni Ou, Chenghao Liu et al.

Automated brain tumor segmentation based on deep learning (DL) has achieved promising performance. However, it generally relies on annotated images for model training, which is not always feasible in clinical settings. Therefore, the development of unsupervised DL-based brain tumor segmentation approaches without expert annotations is desired. Motivated by the success of prompt learning (PL) in natural language processing, we propose an approach to unsupervised brain tumor segmentation by designing image-based prompts that allow indication of brain tumors, and this approach is dubbed as PL-based Brain Tumor Segmentation (PL-BTS). Specifically, instead of directly training a model for brain tumor segmentation with a large amount of annotated data, we seek to train a model that can answer the question: is a voxel in the input image associated with tumor-like hyper-/hypo-intensity? Such a model can be trained by artificially generating tumor-like hyper-/hypo-intensity on images without tumors with hand-crafted designs. Since the hand-crafted designs may be too simplistic to represent all kinds of real tumors, the trained model may overfit the simplistic hand-crafted task rather than actually answer the question of abnormality. To address this problem, we propose the use of a validation task, where we generate a different hand-crafted task to monitor overfitting. In addition, we propose PL-BTS+ that further improves PL-BTS by exploiting unannotated images with brain tumors. Compared with competing unsupervised methods, the proposed method has achieved marked improvements on both public and in-house datasets, and we have also demonstrated its possible extension to other brain lesion segmentation tasks.

Lefei Shen, Mouxiang Chen, Han Fu et al.

Transformer-based models have recently become dominant in Long-term Time Series Forecasting (LTSF), yet the variations in their architecture, such as encoder-only, encoder-decoder, and decoder-only designs, raise a crucial question: What Transformer architecture works best for LTSF tasks? However, existing models are often tightly coupled with various time-series-specific designs, making it difficult to isolate the impact of the architecture itself. To address this, we propose a novel taxonomy that disentangles these designs, enabling clearer and more unified comparisons of Transformer architectures. Our taxonomy considers key aspects such as attention mechanisms, forecasting aggregations, forecasting paradigms, and normalization layers. Through extensive experiments, we uncover several key insights: bi-directional attention with joint-attention is most effective; more complete forecasting aggregation improves performance; and the direct-mapping paradigm outperforms autoregressive approaches. Furthermore, our combined model, utilizing optimal architectural choices, consistently outperforms several existing models, reinforcing the validity of our conclusions. We hope these findings offer valuable guidance for future research on Transformer architectural designs in LTSF. Our code is available at https://github.com/HALF111/TSF_architecture.