12.3LGFeb 24, 2023
Logarithmic Switching Cost in Reinforcement Learning beyond Linear MDPsDan Qiao, Ming Yin, Yu-Xiang Wang · princeton
In many real-life reinforcement learning (RL) problems, deploying new policies is costly. In those scenarios, algorithms must solve exploration (which requires adaptivity) while switching the deployed policy sparsely (which limits adaptivity). In this paper, we go beyond the existing state-of-the-art on this problem that focused on linear Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) by considering linear Bellman-complete MDPs with low inherent Bellman error. We propose the ELEANOR-LowSwitching algorithm that achieves the near-optimal regret with a switching cost logarithmic in the number of episodes and linear in the time-horizon $H$ and feature dimension $d$. We also prove a lower bound proportional to $dH$ among all algorithms with sublinear regret. In addition, we show the ``doubling trick'' used in ELEANOR-LowSwitching can be further leveraged for the generalized linear function approximation, under which we design a sample-efficient algorithm with near-optimal switching cost.
16.5LGJun 2, 2022
Offline Reinforcement Learning with Differential PrivacyDan Qiao, Yu-Xiang Wang
The offline reinforcement learning (RL) problem is often motivated by the need to learn data-driven decision policies in financial, legal and healthcare applications. However, the learned policy could retain sensitive information of individuals in the training data (e.g., treatment and outcome of patients), thus susceptible to various privacy risks. We design offline RL algorithms with differential privacy guarantees which provably prevent such risks. These algorithms also enjoy strong instance-dependent learning bounds under both tabular and linear Markov decision process (MDP) settings. Our theory and simulation suggest that the privacy guarantee comes at (almost) no drop in utility comparing to the non-private counterpart for a medium-size dataset.
14.6LGDec 9, 2022
Near-Optimal Differentially Private Reinforcement LearningDan Qiao, Yu-Xiang Wang
Motivated by personalized healthcare and other applications involving sensitive data, we study online exploration in reinforcement learning with differential privacy (DP) constraints. Existing work on this problem established that no-regret learning is possible under joint differential privacy (JDP) and local differential privacy (LDP) but did not provide an algorithm with optimal regret. We close this gap for the JDP case by designing an $ε$-JDP algorithm with a regret of $\widetilde{O}(\sqrt{SAH^2T}+S^2AH^3/ε)$ which matches the information-theoretic lower bound of non-private learning for all choices of $ε> S^{1.5}A^{0.5} H^2/\sqrt{T}$. In the above, $S$, $A$ denote the number of states and actions, $H$ denotes the planning horizon, and $T$ is the number of steps. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first private RL algorithm that achieves \emph{privacy for free} asymptotically as $T\rightarrow \infty$. Our techniques -- which could be of independent interest -- include privately releasing Bernstein-type exploration bonuses and an improved method for releasing visitation statistics. The same techniques also imply a slightly improved regret bound for the LDP case.
2.6LGApr 11, 2024
Differentially Private Reinforcement Learning with Self-PlayDan Qiao, Yu-Xiang Wang
We study the problem of multi-agent reinforcement learning (multi-agent RL) with differential privacy (DP) constraints. This is well-motivated by various real-world applications involving sensitive data, where it is critical to protect users' private information. We first extend the definitions of Joint DP (JDP) and Local DP (LDP) to two-player zero-sum episodic Markov Games, where both definitions ensure trajectory-wise privacy protection. Then we design a provably efficient algorithm based on optimistic Nash value iteration and privatization of Bernstein-type bonuses. The algorithm is able to satisfy JDP and LDP requirements when instantiated with appropriate privacy mechanisms. Furthermore, for both notions of DP, our regret bound generalizes the best known result under the single-agent RL case, while our regret could also reduce to the best known result for multi-agent RL without privacy constraints. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first line of results towards understanding trajectory-wise privacy protection in multi-agent RL.