Neelam Tyagi

Jue Jiang, Jun Hong, Kathryn Tringale et al.

Method: ProRSeg was trained using 5-fold cross-validation with 110 T2-weighted MRI acquired at 5 treatment fractions from 10 different patients, taking care that same patient scans were not placed in training and testing folds. Segmentation accuracy was measured using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance at 95th percentile (HD95). Registration consistency was measured using coefficient of variation (CV) in displacement of OARs. Ablation tests and accuracy comparisons against multiple methods were done. Finally, applicability of ProRSeg to segment cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans was evaluated on 80 scans using 5-fold cross-validation. Results: ProRSeg processed 3D volumes (128 $\times$ 192 $\times$ 128) in 3 secs on a NVIDIA Tesla V100 GPU. It's segmentations were significantly more accurate ($p<0.001$) than compared methods, achieving a DSC of 0.94 $\pm$0.02 for liver, 0.88$\pm$0.04 for large bowel, 0.78$\pm$0.03 for small bowel and 0.82$\pm$0.04 for stomach-duodenum from MRI. ProRSeg achieved a DSC of 0.72$\pm$0.01 for small bowel and 0.76$\pm$0.03 for stomach-duodenum from CBCT. ProRSeg registrations resulted in the lowest CV in displacement (stomach-duodenum $CV_{x}$: 0.75\%, $CV_{y}$: 0.73\%, and $CV_{z}$: 0.81\%; small bowel $CV_{x}$: 0.80\%, $CV_{y}$: 0.80\%, and $CV_{z}$: 0.68\%; large bowel $CV_{x}$: 0.71\%, $CV_{y}$ : 0.81\%, and $CV_{z}$: 0.75\%). ProRSeg based dose accumulation accounting for intra-fraction (pre-treatment to post-treatment MRI scan) and inter-fraction motion showed that the organ dose constraints were violated in 4 patients for stomach-duodenum and for 3 patients for small bowel. Study limitations include lack of independent testing and ground truth phantom datasets to measure dose accumulation accuracy.

Jue Jiang, Jason Hu, Neelam Tyagi et al.

Lung tumors, especially those located close to or surrounded by soft tissues like the mediastinum, are difficult to segment due to the low soft tissue contrast on computed tomography images. Magnetic resonance images contain superior soft-tissue contrast information that can be leveraged if both modalities were available for training. Therefore, we developed a cross-modality educed learning approach where MR information that is educed from CT is used to hallucinate MRI and improve CT segmentation. Our approach, called cross-modality educed deep learning segmentation (CMEDL) combines CT and pseudo MR produced from CT by aligning their features to obtain segmentation on CT. Features computed in the last two layers of parallelly trained CT and MR segmentation networks are aligned. We implemented this approach on U-net and dense fully convolutional networks (dense-FCN). Our networks were trained on unrelated cohorts from open-source the Cancer Imaging Archive CT images (N=377), an internal archive T2-weighted MR (N=81), and evaluated using separate validation (N=304) and testing (N=333) CT-delineated tumors. Our approach using both networks were significantly more accurate (U-net $P <0.001$; denseFCN $P <0.001$) than CT-only networks and achieved an accuracy (Dice similarity coefficient) of 0.71$\pm$0.15 (U-net), 0.74$\pm$0.12 (denseFCN) on validation and 0.72$\pm$0.14 (U-net), 0.73$\pm$0.12 (denseFCN) on the testing sets. Our novel approach demonstrated that educing cross-modality information through learned priors enhances CT segmentation performance

Jorge Tapias Gomez, Nishant Nadkarni, Lando S. Bosma et al.

Objective: Clinical implementation of deformable image registration (DIR) requires voxel-based spatial accuracy metrics such as manually identified landmarks, which are challenging to implement for highly mobile gastrointestinal (GI) organs. To address this, patient-specific digital twins (DT) modeling temporally varying motion were created to assess the accuracy of DIR methods. Approach: 21 motion phases simulating digestive GI motion as 4D sequences were generated from static 3D patient scans using published analytical GI motion models through a semi-automated pipeline. Eleven datasets, including six T2w FSE MRI (T2w MRI), two T1w 4D golden-angle stack-of-stars, and three contrast-enhanced CT scans. The motion amplitudes of the DTs were assessed against real patient stomach motion amplitudes extracted from independent 4D MRI datasets. The generated DTs were then used to assess six different DIR methods using target registration error, Dice similarity coefficient, and the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance using summary metrics and voxel-level granular visualizations. Finally, for a subset of T2w MRI scans from patients treated with MR-guided radiation therapy, dose distributions were warped and accumulated to assess dose warping errors, including evaluations of DIR performance in both low- and high-dose regions for patient-specific error estimation. Main results: Our proposed pipeline synthesized DTs modeling realistic GI motion, achieving mean and maximum motion amplitudes and a mean log Jacobian determinant within 0.8 mm and 0.01, respectively, similar to published real-patient gastric motion data. It also enables the extraction of detailed quantitative DIR performance metrics and rigorous validation of dose mapping accuracy. Significance: The pipeline enables rigorously testing DIR tools for dynamic, anatomically complex regions enabling granular spatial and dosimetric accuracies.

Jue Jiang, Yu Chi Hu, Neelam Tyagi et al.

We developed a new joint probabilistic segmentation and image distribution matching generative adversarial network (PSIGAN) for unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) and multi-organ segmentation from magnetic resonance (MRI) images. Our UDA approach models the co-dependency between images and their segmentation as a joint probability distribution using a new structure discriminator. The structure discriminator computes structure of interest focused adversarial loss by combining the generated pseudo MRI with probabilistic segmentations produced by a simultaneously trained segmentation sub-network. The segmentation sub-network is trained using the pseudo MRI produced by the generator sub-network. This leads to a cyclical optimization of both the generator and segmentation sub-networks that are jointly trained as part of an end-to-end network. Extensive experiments and comparisons against multiple state-of-the-art methods were done on four different MRI sequences totalling 257 scans for generating multi-organ and tumor segmentation. The experiments included, (a) 20 T1-weighted (T1w) in-phase mdixon and (b) 20 T2-weighted (T2w) abdominal MRI for segmenting liver, spleen, left and right kidneys, (c) 162 T2-weighted fat suppressed head and neck MRI (T2wFS) for parotid gland segmentation, and (d) 75 T2w MRI for lung tumor segmentation. Our method achieved an overall average DSC of 0.87 on T1w and 0.90 on T2w for the abdominal organs, 0.82 on T2wFS for the parotid glands, and 0.77 on T2w MRI for lung tumors.

Peter Klages, Ilyes Benslimane, Sadegh Riyahi et al.

A total of twenty paired CT and MR images were used in this study to investigate two conditional generative adversarial networks, Pix2Pix, and Cycle GAN, for generating synthetic CT images for Headand Neck cancer cases. Ten of the patient cases were used for training and included such common artifacts as dental implants; the remaining ten testing cases were used for testing and included a larger range of image features commonly found in clinical head and neck cases. These features included strong metal artifacts from dental implants, one case with a metal implant, and one case with abnormal anatomy. The original CT images were deformably registered to the mDixon FFE MR images to minimize the effects of processing the MR images. The sCT generation accuracy and robustness were evaluated using Mean Absolute Error (MAE) based on the Hounsfield Units (HU) for three regions (whole body, bone, and air within the body), Mean Error (ME) to observe systematic average offset errors in the sCT generation, and dosimetric evaluation of all clinically relevant structures. For the test set the MAE for the Pix2Pix and Cycle GAN models were 92.4 $\pm$ 13.5 HU, and 100.7 $\pm$ 14.6 HU, respectively, for the body region, 166.3 $\pm$ 31.8 HU, and 184 $\pm$ 31.9 HU, respectively, for the bone region, and 183.7 $\pm$ 41.3 HU and 185.4 $\pm$ 37.9 HU for the air regions. The ME for Pix2Pix and Cycle GAN were 21.0 $\pm$ 11.8 HU and 37.5 $\pm$ 14.9 HU, respectively. Absolute Percent Mean/Max Dose Errors were less than 2% for the PTV and all critical structures for both models, and DRRs generated from these models looked qualitatively similar to CT generated DRRs showing these methods are promising for MR-only planning.