Ariel Felner

Hadar Peer, Carlos Hernandez, Sven Koenig et al.

Empirical evaluation in multi-objective search (MOS) has historically suffered from fragmentation, relying on heterogeneous problem instances with incompatible objective definitions that make cross-study comparisons difficult. This standardization gap is further exacerbated by the realization that DIMACS road networks, a historical default benchmark for the field, exhibit highly correlated objectives that fail to capture diverse Pareto-front structures. To address this, we introduce the first comprehensive, standardized benchmark suite for exact and approximate MOS. Our suite spans four structurally diverse domains: real-world road networks, structured synthetic graphs, game-based grid environments, and high-dimensional robotic motion-planning roadmaps. By providing fixed graph instances, standardized start-goal queries, and both exact and approximate reference Pareto-optimal solution sets, this suite captures a full spectrum of objective interactions: from strongly correlated to strictly independent. Ultimately, this benchmark provides a common foundation to ensure future MOS evaluations are robust, reproducible, and structurally comprehensive.

Eyal Weiss, Ariel Felner, Gal A. Kaminka

The shortest path problem in graphs is a cornerstone of AI theory and applications. Existing algorithms generally ignore edge weight computation time. We present a generalized framework for weighted directed graphs, where edge weight can be computed (estimated) multiple times, at increasing accuracy and run-time expense. This raises several generalized variants of the shortest path problem. We introduce the problem of finding a path with the tightest lower-bound on the optimal cost. We then present two complete algorithms for the generalized problem, and empirically demonstrate their efficacy.

Tzur Shubi, Ariel Felner, Solomon Eyal Shimony et al.

Bidirectional heuristic search can potentially reduce search effort for problems amenable to backward search. Therein, it is well-known that front-to-front heuristics can reduce the number of node expansions, but their overhead is so high that overall runtime almost always increases. We propose BiXDFBnB, a bidirectional depth-first branch-and-bound algorithm that adapts the Single-Frontier Bidirectional Search (SFBDS) framework - originally developed for shortest-path (MIN) problems - to the Generalized Longest Simple Path (GLSP) setting. Because SFBDS inherently operates on paired states, front-to-front (F2F) heuristic evaluation arises naturally and avoids the overhead typically associated with bidirectional frontier management. We show that this adaptation can be successfully applied to maximization (MAX) problems while efficiently handling overlapping constraints. BiXDFBnB is applied to several types of longest-path problems: Longest Simple Path (LSP), Snakes, and Coil-in-the-Box (CIB). Empirical evaluation shows that the new algorithm frequently reduces the number of node expansions and, in some cases, also improves overall runtime.

Eyal Weiss, Ariel Felner, Gal A. Kaminka

The shortest path problem in graphs is fundamental to AI. Nearly all variants of the problem and relevant algorithms that solve them ignore edge-weight computation time and its common relation to weight uncertainty. This implies that taking these factors into consideration can potentially lead to a performance boost in relevant applications. Recently, a generalized framework for weighted directed graphs was suggested, where edge-weight can be computed (estimated) multiple times, at increasing accuracy and run-time expense. We build on this framework to introduce the problem of finding the tightest admissible shortest path (TASP); a path with the tightest suboptimality bound on the optimal cost. This is a generalization of the shortest path problem to bounded uncertainty, where edge-weight uncertainty can be traded for computational cost. We present a complete algorithm for solving TASP, with guarantees on solution quality. Empirical evaluation supports the effectiveness of this approach.

Srikar Gouru, Ariel Felner, Jiaoyang Li

In this paper, we tackle the Multiple Watchman Route Problem (MWRP), which aims to find a set of paths that M watchmen can follow such that every location on the map can be seen by at least one watchman. First, we propose multiple methods to reduce the state space over which a search needs to be conducted by pruning map areas that are guaranteed to be seen en route to other areas. Next, we introduce MWRP-CP3, an efficient optimal planner that combines these methods with techniques that improve the quality and calculation time of existing heuristics. We present several suboptimal algorithms with bounds on solution quality, including MxWA*, a general variant of weighted A* for makespan problems. We also present anytime variations of our suboptimal algorithms, as well as techniques to improve an existing suboptimal solution by solving multiple decomposed sub-problems. We show that MWRP-CP3 can reduce the search space by more than 95% and runs more than 200x faster than existing optimal algorithms on 2D grid maps. We also show that our suboptimal algorithms solve maps 3x larger than those solvable by MWRP-CP3. See mwrp-cp3.github.io for the open source codebase and video demonstrations.

Shahaf S. Shperberg, Natalie Morad, Lior Siag et al.

Recent advancements in bidirectional heuristic search have yielded significant theoretical insights and novel algorithms. While most previous work has concentrated on optimal search methods, this paper focuses on bounded-suboptimal bidirectional search, where a bound on the suboptimality of the solution cost is specified. We build upon the state-of-the-art optimal bidirectional search algorithm, BAE*, designed for consistent heuristics, and introduce several variants of BAE* specifically tailored for the bounded-suboptimal context. Through experimental evaluation, we compare the performance of these new variants against other bounded-suboptimal bidirectional algorithms as well as the standard weighted A* algorithm. Our results demonstrate that each algorithm excels under distinct conditions, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each approach.

Maya Wolff, Ariel Felner, Oren Salzman

Multi-objective shortest-path (MOSP) algorithms traditionally rely on single-valued heuristics (SVHs), which associate each state with a single admissible cost vector. While SVHs provide safe lower bounds, they fail to capture the trade-off structure of the Pareto frontier and often yield weak search guidance. Multi-valued heuristics (MVHs) address this limitation by mapping states to sets of cost estimates, enabling a richer approximation of possible trade-offs. Modern MOSP algorithms are highly dependent on dimensionality reduction (DR) techniques to efficiently perform dominance checks. However, integrating MVHs with DR introduces subtle correctness challenges. We show that naively combining DR with MVHs destroys the ordering invariants required for DR, leading to unsound and incomplete search. To address this issue, we develop the first theoretical frameworks for safely integrating MVHs with DR. First, we introduce $\text{NAMOA}^*{\text{dr}\text{-}\text{mvh}}$, a theoretical baseline that restores search correctness by enforcing heuristic consistency. Recognizing the practical limitations of this approach, we then introduce our primary contribution, $\text{L}\text{-}\text{NAMOA}^*{\text{dr}\text{-}\text{mvh}}$. This algorithm employs a "lazy," optimistic approach to DR, preserving exact correctness with only an admissible MVH by dynamically detecting and repairing local ordering violations. Across a range of benchmarks, $\text{L}\text{-}\text{NAMOA}^*{\text{dr}\text{-}\text{mvh}}$ matches or improves over state-of-the-art MOSP algorithms, and achieves speedups of over 10x in instances where the additional guidance provided by the MVH translates into stronger pruning.

Thayne T. Walker, Nathan R. Sturtevant, Ariel Felner

While the study of unit-cost Multi-Agent Pathfinding (MAPF) problems has been popular, many real-world problems require continuous time and costs due to various movement models. In this context, this paper studies symmetry-breaking enhancements for Continuous-Time Conflict-Based Search (CCBS), a solver for continuous-time MAPF. Resolving conflict symmetries in MAPF can require an exponential amount of work. We adapt known enhancements from unit-cost domains for CCBS: bypassing, which resolves cost symmetries and biclique constraints which resolve spatial conflict symmetries. We formulate a novel combination of biclique constraints with disjoint splitting for spatial conflict symmetries. Finally, we show empirically that these enhancements yield a statistically significant performance improvement versus previous state of the art, solving problems for up to 10% or 20% more agents in the same amount of time on dense graphs.

Yaron Halle, Ariel Felner, Sven Koenig et al.

The bi-objective shortest-path (BOSP) problem seeks to find paths between start and target vertices of a graph while optimizing two conflicting objective functions. We consider the BOSP problem in the presence of correlated objectives. Such correlations often occur in real-world settings such as road networks, where optimizing two positively correlated objectives, such as travel time and fuel consumption, is common. BOSP is generally computationally challenging as the size of the search space is exponential in the number of objective functions and the graph size. Bounded sub-optimal BOSP solvers such as A*pex alleviate this complexity by approximating the Pareto-optimal solution set rather than computing it exactly (given a user-provided approximation factor). As the correlation between objective functions increases, smaller approximation factors are sufficient for collapsing the entire Pareto-optimal set into a single solution. We leverage this insight to propose an efficient algorithm that reduces the search effort in the presence of correlated objectives. Our approach for computing approximations of the entire Pareto-optimal set is inspired by graph-clustering algorithms. It uses a preprocessing phase to identify correlated clusters within a graph and to generate a new graph representation. This allows a natural generalization of A*pex to run up to five times faster on DIMACS dataset instances, a standard benchmark in the field. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first algorithm proposed that efficiently and effectively exploits correlations in the context of bi-objective search while providing theoretical guarantees on solution quality.

Lior Siag, Shahaf S. Shperberg, Ariel Felner et al.

Parallelization and External Memory (PEM) techniques have significantly enhanced the capabilities of search algorithms when solving large-scale problems. Previous research on PEM has primarily centered on unidirectional algorithms, with only one publication on bidirectional PEM that focuses on the meet-in-the-middle (MM) algorithm. Building upon this foundation, this paper presents a framework that integrates both uni- and bi-directional best-first search algorithms into this framework. We then develop a PEM variant of the state-of-the-art bidirectional heuristic search (BiHS) algorithm BAE* (PEM-BAE*). As previous work on BiHS did not focus on scaling problem sizes, this work enables us to evaluate bidirectional algorithms on hard problems. Empirical evaluation shows that PEM-BAE* outperforms the PEM variants of A* and the MM algorithm, as well as a parallel variant of IDA*. These findings mark a significant milestone, revealing that bidirectional search algorithms clearly outperform unidirectional search algorithms across several domains, even when equipped with state-of-the-art heuristics.

Roni Stern, Nathan Sturtevant, Ariel Felner et al.

The MAPF problem is the fundamental problem of planning paths for multiple agents, where the key constraint is that the agents will be able to follow these paths concurrently without colliding with each other. Applications of MAPF include automated warehouses and autonomous vehicles. Research on MAPF has been flourishing in the past couple of years. Different MAPF research papers make different assumptions, e.g., whether agents can traverse the same road at the same time, and have different objective functions, e.g., minimize makespan or sum of agents' actions costs. These assumptions and objectives are sometimes implicitly assumed or described informally. This makes it difficult to establish appropriate baselines for comparison in research papers, as well as making it difficult for practitioners to find the papers relevant to their concrete application. This paper aims to fill this gap and support researchers and practitioners by providing a unifying terminology for describing common MAPF assumptions and objectives. In addition, we also provide pointers to two MAPF benchmarks. In particular, we introduce a new grid-based benchmark for MAPF, and demonstrate experimentally that it poses a challenge to contemporary MAPF algorithms.

Hang Ma, Glenn Wagner, Ariel Felner et al.

We formalize Multi-Agent Path Finding with Deadlines (MAPF-DL). The objective is to maximize the number of agents that can reach their given goal vertices from their given start vertices within the deadline, without colliding with each other. We first show that MAPF-DL is NP-hard to solve optimally. We then present two classes of optimal algorithms, one based on a reduction of MAPF-DL to a flow problem and a subsequent compact integer linear programming formulation of the resulting reduced abstracted multi-commodity flow network and the other one based on novel combinatorial search algorithms. Our empirical results demonstrate that these MAPF-DL solvers scale well and each one dominates the other ones in different scenarios.

Hang Ma, Glenn Wagner, Ariel Felner et al.

We formalize the problem of multi-agent path finding with deadlines (MAPF-DL). The objective is to maximize the number of agents that can reach their given goal vertices from their given start vertices within a given deadline, without colliding with each other. We first show that the MAPF-DL problem is NP-hard to solve optimally. We then present an optimal MAPF-DL algorithm based on a reduction of the MAPF-DL problem to a flow problem and a subsequent compact integer linear programming formulation of the resulting reduced abstracted multi-commodity flow network.

Pavel Surynek, Ariel Felner, Roni Stern et al.

In multi-agent path finding (MAPF) the task is to find non-conflicting paths for multiple agents. In this paper we focus on finding suboptimal solutions for MAPF for the sum-of-costs variant. Recently, a SAT-based approached was developed to solve this problem and proved beneficial in many cases when compared to other search-based solvers. In this paper, we present SAT-based unbounded- and bounded-suboptimal algorithms and compare them to relevant algorithms. Experimental results show that in many case the SAT-based solver significantly outperforms the search-based solvers.

David Tolpin, Oded Betzalel, Ariel Felner et al.

Recent advances in metareasoning for search has shown its usefulness in improving numerous search algorithms. This paper applies rational metareasoning to IDA* when several admissible heuristics are available. The obvious basic approach of taking the maximum of the heuristics is improved upon by lazy evaluation of the heuristics, resulting in a variant known as Lazy IDA*. We introduce a rational version of lazy IDA* that decides whether to compute the more expensive heuristics or to bypass it, based on a myopic expected regret estimate. Empirical evaluation in several domains supports the theoretical results, and shows that rational lazy IDA* is a state-of-the-art heuristic combination method.

David Tolpin, Tal Beja, Solomon Eyal Shimony et al.

The obvious way to use several admissible heuristics in A* is to take their maximum. In this paper we aim to reduce the time spent on computing heuristics. We discuss Lazy A*, a variant of A* where heuristics are evaluated lazily: only when they are essential to a decision to be made in the A* search process. We present a new rational meta-reasoning based scheme, rational lazy A*, which decides whether to compute the more expensive heuristics at all, based on a myopic value of information estimate. Both methods are examined theoretically. Empirical evaluation on several domains supports the theoretical results, and shows that lazy A* and rational lazy A* are state-of-the-art heuristic combination methods.