Nazifa Azam Khan

Nazifa Azam Khan, Mikolaj Cieslak, Ian McQuillan

Artificial neural networks are often used to identify features of crop plants. However, training their models requires many annotated images, which can be expensive and time-consuming to acquire. Procedural models of plants, such as those developed with Lindenmayer-systems (L-systems) can be created to produce visually realistic simulations, and hence images of plant simulations, where annotations are implicitly known. These synthetic images can either augment or completely replace real images in training neural networks for phenotyping tasks. In this paper, we systematically vary amounts of real and synthetic images used for training in both maize and canola to better understand situations where synthetic images generated from L-systems can help prediction on real images. This work also explores the degree to which realism in the synthetic images improves prediction. We have five different variants of a procedural canola model (these variants were created by tuning the realism while using calibration), and the deep learning results showed how drastically these results improve as the canola synthetic images are made to be more realistic. Furthermore, we see how neural network predictions can be used to help calibrate L-systems themselves, creating a feedback loop.

Nazifa Khan, Oliver A. S. Lyon, Mark Eramian et al.

Manual determination of plant phenotypic properties such as plant architecture, growth, and health is very time consuming and sometimes destructive. Automatic image analysis has become a popular approach. This research aims to identify the position (and number) of leaves from a temporal sequence of high-quality indoor images consisting of multiple views, focussing in particular of images of maize. The procedure used a segmentation on the images, using the convex hull to pick the best view at each time step, followed by a skeletonization of the corresponding image. To remove skeleton spurs, a discrete skeleton evolution pruning process was applied. Pre-existing statistics regarding maize development was incorporated to help differentiate between true leaves and false leaves. Furthermore, for each time step, leaves were matched to those of the previous and next three days using the graph-theoretic Hungarian algorithm. This matching algorithm can be used to both remove false positives, and also to predict true leaves, even if they were completely occluded from the image itself. The algorithm was evaluated using an open dataset consisting of 13 maize plants across 27 days from two different views. The total number of true leaves from the dataset was 1843, and our proposed techniques detect a total of 1690 leaves including 1674 true leaves, and only 16 false leaves, giving a recall of 90.8%, and a precision of 99.0%.