Umar Farooq

Vinaik Chhetri, A. B Siddique, Umar Farooq

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in software development. However, while LLMs remain static after pretraining, programming languages and APIs continue to evolve, leading to the generation of deprecated or incompatible code that undermines reliability. Retraining LLMs from scratch to reflect such changes is computationally expensive, making model editing a promising lightweight alternative that updates only a small subset of parameters. Despite its potential, it remains unclear whether model editing yields genuine syntactic and semantic adaptations or merely superficial fixes. In this work, we present a systematic study of five state-of-the-art model editing methods: Constrained Fine-Tuning (FT), GRACE, MEMIT, PMET, and ROME. We apply these methods to three leading open-source code LLMs, CodeLlama, CodeQwen1.5, and DeepSeek-Coder, under controlled API deprecation scenarios. Our evaluation covers both instant and sequential editing settings, using three disjoint evaluation sets designed to assess reliability, generalization, and specificity. We measure model correctness at three levels: successful compilation, partial test case pass, and full test pass. Our findings show that instant edits consistently degrade model performance, with syntactic validity dropping by up to 86 percentage points and functional correctness declining by 45 points even in the best-performing setting. Sequential edits further amplify this degradation, and in some cases, model performance collapses entirely. Across all models, most passing generations relied on workarounds rather than correctly adopting the intended changes, while faulty adoptions that result in test failures or compilation errors were significantly more frequent. Correct adoptions, where the model correctly integrates the intended change, occurred in only about 6% of cases.

Muhammad Umair Haider, Umar Farooq, A. B. Siddique et al.

Language Models (LMs) have shown their application for tasks pertinent to code and several code~LMs have been proposed recently. The majority of the studies in this direction only focus on the improvements in performance of the LMs on different benchmarks, whereas LMs are considered black boxes. Besides this, a handful of works attempt to understand the role of attention layers in the code~LMs. Nonetheless, feed-forward layers remain under-explored which consist of two-thirds of a typical transformer model's parameters. In this work, we attempt to gain insights into the inner workings of code language models by examining the feed-forward layers. To conduct our investigations, we use two state-of-the-art code~LMs, Codegen-Mono and Ploycoder, and three widely used programming languages, Java, Go, and Python. We focus on examining the organization of stored concepts, the editability of these concepts, and the roles of different layers and input context size variations for output generation. Our empirical findings demonstrate that lower layers capture syntactic patterns while higher layers encode abstract concepts and semantics. We show concepts of interest can be edited within feed-forward layers without compromising code~LM performance. Additionally, we observe initial layers serve as ``thinking'' layers, while later layers are crucial for predicting subsequent code tokens. Furthermore, we discover earlier layers can accurately predict smaller contexts, but larger contexts need critical later layers' contributions. We anticipate these findings will facilitate better understanding, debugging, and testing of code~LMs.