Weiran Liu

CR
h-index14
4papers
56citations
Novelty61%
AI Score41

4 Papers

11.8LGOct 4, 2022Code
OpBoost: A Vertical Federated Tree Boosting Framework Based on Order-Preserving Desensitization

Xiaochen Li, Yuke Hu, Weiran Liu et al.

Vertical Federated Learning (FL) is a new paradigm that enables users with non-overlapping attributes of the same data samples to jointly train a model without directly sharing the raw data. Nevertheless, recent works show that it's still not sufficient to prevent privacy leakage from the training process or the trained model. This paper focuses on studying the privacy-preserving tree boosting algorithms under the vertical FL. The existing solutions based on cryptography involve heavy computation and communication overhead and are vulnerable to inference attacks. Although the solution based on Local Differential Privacy (LDP) addresses the above problems, it leads to the low accuracy of the trained model. This paper explores to improve the accuracy of the widely deployed tree boosting algorithms satisfying differential privacy under vertical FL. Specifically, we introduce a framework called OpBoost. Three order-preserving desensitization algorithms satisfying a variant of LDP called distance-based LDP (dLDP) are designed to desensitize the training data. In particular, we optimize the dLDP definition and study efficient sampling distributions to further improve the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed algorithms. The proposed algorithms provide a trade-off between the privacy of pairs with large distance and the utility of desensitized values. Comprehensive evaluations show that OpBoost has a better performance on prediction accuracy of trained models compared with existing LDP approaches on reasonable settings. Our code is open source.

12.0CRJun 16, 2025Code
Rectifying Privacy and Efficacy Measurements in Machine Unlearning: A New Inference Attack Perspective

Nima Naderloui, Shenao Yan, Binghui Wang et al.

Machine unlearning focuses on efficiently removing specific data from trained models, addressing privacy and compliance concerns with reasonable costs. Although exact unlearning ensures complete data removal equivalent to retraining, it is impractical for large-scale models, leading to growing interest in inexact unlearning methods. However, the lack of formal guarantees in these methods necessitates the need for robust evaluation frameworks to assess their privacy and effectiveness. In this work, we first identify several key pitfalls of the existing unlearning evaluation frameworks, e.g., focusing on average-case evaluation or targeting random samples for evaluation, incomplete comparisons with the retraining baseline. Then, we propose RULI (Rectified Unlearning Evaluation Framework via Likelihood Inference), a novel framework to address critical gaps in the evaluation of inexact unlearning methods. RULI introduces a dual-objective attack to measure both unlearning efficacy and privacy risks at a per-sample granularity. Our findings reveal significant vulnerabilities in state-of-the-art unlearning methods, where RULI achieves higher attack success rates, exposing privacy risks underestimated by existing methods. Built on a game-based foundation and validated through empirical evaluations on both image and text data (spanning tasks from classification to generation), RULI provides a rigorous, scalable, and fine-grained methodology for evaluating unlearning techniques.

10.2CRSep 29, 2020
Privacy Enhancement via Dummy Points in the Shuffle Model

Xiaochen Li, Weiran Liu, Hanwen Feng et al.

The shuffle model is recently proposed to address the issue of severe utility loss in Local Differential Privacy (LDP) due to distributed data randomization.In the shuffle model, a shuffler is utilized to break the link between the user identity and the message uploaded to the data analyst. Since less noise needs to be introduced to achieve the same privacy guarantee, following this paradigm, the utility of privacy-preserving data collection is improved. We propose DUMP (\underline{DUM}my-\underline{P}oint-based), a framework for privacy-preserving histogram estimation in the shuffle model. The core of DUMP is a new concept of \emph{dummy blanket}, which enables enhancing privacy by just introducing \textit{points }on the user side and further improving the utility of the shuffle model.We instantiate DUMP by proposing two protocols: pureDUMP and mixDUMP, and conduct a comprehensive experimental evaluation to compare them with existing protocols. The experimental results show that, under the same privacy guarantee, (1) the proposed protocols have significant improvements in communication efficiency over all existing multi-message protocols, by at least 3 orders of magnitude; (2) they achieve competitive utility, while the only known protocol (Ghazi \textit{et al.}, PMLR 2020) having better utility than ours employs hard-to-exactly-sample distributions which are vulnerable to floating-point attacks (CCS 2012).

7.2CRSep 11, 2020
Strengthening Order Preserving Encryption with Differential Privacy

Amrita Roy Chowdhury, Bolin Ding, Somesh Jha et al.

Ciphertexts of an order-preserving encryption (OPE) scheme preserve the order of their corresponding plaintexts. However, OPEs are vulnerable to inference attacks that exploit this preserved order. At another end, differential privacy has become the de-facto standard for achieving data privacy. One of the most attractive properties of DP is that any post-processing (inferential) computation performed on the noisy output of a DP algorithm does not degrade its privacy guarantee. In this paper, we propose a novel differentially private order preserving encryption scheme, OP$ε$. Under OP$ε$, the leakage of order from the ciphertexts is differentially private. As a result, in the least, OP$ε$ ensures a formal guarantee (specifically, a relaxed DP guarantee) even in the face of inference attacks. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to combine DP with a property-preserving encryption scheme. We demonstrate OP$ε$'s practical utility in answering range queries via extensive empirical evaluation on four real-world datasets. For instance, OP$ε$ misses only around $4$ in every $10K$ correct records on average for a dataset of size $\sim732K$ with an attribute of domain size $\sim18K$ and $ε= 1$.