Yujin Choi

LG
h-index2
4papers
32citations
Novelty44%
AI Score31

4 Papers

13.7LGJun 9, 2023Code
Differentially Private Sharpness-Aware Training

Jinseong Park, Hoki Kim, Yujin Choi et al.

Training deep learning models with differential privacy (DP) results in a degradation of performance. The training dynamics of models with DP show a significant difference from standard training, whereas understanding the geometric properties of private learning remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we investigate sharpness, a key factor in achieving better generalization, in private learning. We show that flat minima can help reduce the negative effects of per-example gradient clipping and the addition of Gaussian noise. We then verify the effectiveness of Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) for seeking flat minima in private learning. However, we also discover that SAM is detrimental to the privacy budget and computational time due to its two-step optimization. Thus, we propose a new sharpness-aware training method that mitigates the privacy-optimization trade-off. Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method improves the performance of deep learning models with DP from both scratch and fine-tuning. Code is available at https://github.com/jinseongP/DPSAT.

12.3LGJan 27, 2023
Exploring the Effect of Multi-step Ascent in Sharpness-Aware Minimization

Hoki Kim, Jinseong Park, Yujin Choi et al.

Recently, Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) has shown state-of-the-art performance by seeking flat minima. To minimize the maximum loss within a neighborhood in the parameter space, SAM uses an ascent step, which perturbs the weights along the direction of gradient ascent with a given radius. While single-step or multi-step can be taken during ascent steps, previous studies have shown that multi-step ascent SAM rarely improves generalization performance. However, this phenomenon is particularly interesting because the multi-step ascent is expected to provide a better approximation of the maximum neighborhood loss. Therefore, in this paper, we analyze the effect of the number of ascent steps and investigate the difference between both single-step ascent SAM and multi-step ascent SAM. We identify the effect of the number of ascent on SAM optimization and reveal that single-step ascent SAM and multi-step ascent SAM exhibit distinct loss landscapes. Based on these observations, we finally suggest a simple modification that can mitigate the inefficiency of multi-step ascent SAM.

4.6LGDec 13, 2024Code
Leveraging Programmatically Generated Synthetic Data for Differentially Private Diffusion Training

Yujin Choi, Jinseong Park, Junyoung Byun et al.

Programmatically generated synthetic data has been used in differential private training for classification to enhance performance without privacy leakage. However, as the synthetic data is generated from a random process, the distribution of real data and the synthetic data are distinguishable and difficult to transfer. Therefore, the model trained with the synthetic data generates unrealistic random images, raising challenges to adapt the synthetic data for generative models. In this work, we propose DP-SynGen, which leverages programmatically generated synthetic data in diffusion models to address this challenge. By exploiting the three stages of diffusion models(coarse, context, and cleaning) we identify stages where synthetic data can be effectively utilized. We theoretically and empirically verified that cleaning and coarse stages can be trained without private data, replacing them with synthetic data to reduce the privacy budget. The experimental results show that DP-SynGen improves the quality of generative data by mitigating the negative impact of privacy-induced noise on the generation process.

4.6LGNov 10, 2024
BayesNAM: Leveraging Inconsistency for Reliable Explanations

Hoki Kim, Jinseong Park, Yujin Choi et al.

Neural additive model (NAM) is a recently proposed explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) method that utilizes neural network-based architectures. Given the advantages of neural networks, NAMs provide intuitive explanations for their predictions with high model performance. In this paper, we analyze a critical yet overlooked phenomenon: NAMs often produce inconsistent explanations, even when using the same architecture and dataset. Traditionally, such inconsistencies have been viewed as issues to be resolved. However, we argue instead that these inconsistencies can provide valuable explanations within the given data model. Through a simple theoretical framework, we demonstrate that these inconsistencies are not mere artifacts but emerge naturally in datasets with multiple important features. To effectively leverage this information, we introduce a novel framework, Bayesian Neural Additive Model (BayesNAM), which integrates Bayesian neural networks and feature dropout, with theoretical proof demonstrating that feature dropout effectively captures model inconsistencies. Our experiments demonstrate that BayesNAM effectively reveals potential problems such as insufficient data or structural limitations of the model, providing more reliable explanations and potential remedies.