Jiajun Zhu

Zixun Lan, Binjie Hong, Jiajun Zhu et al.

Predicting reactants from a specified core product stands as a fundamental challenge within organic synthesis, termed retrosynthesis prediction. Recently, semi-template-based methods and graph-edits-based methods have achieved good performance in terms of both interpretability and accuracy. However, due to their mechanisms these methods cannot predict complex reactions, e.g., reactions with multiple reaction center or attaching the same leaving group to more than one atom. In this study we propose a semi-template-based method, the \textbf{Retro}synthesis via \textbf{S}earch \textbf{i}n (Hyper) \textbf{G}raph (RetroSiG) framework to alleviate these limitations. In the proposed method, we turn the reaction center identification and the leaving group completion tasks as tasks of searching in the product molecular graph and leaving group hypergraph respectively. As a semi-template-based method RetroSiG has several advantages. First, RetroSiG is able to handle the complex reactions mentioned above by its novel search mechanism. Second, RetroSiG naturally exploits the hypergraph to model the implicit dependencies between leaving groups. Third, RetroSiG makes full use of the prior, i.e., one-hop constraint. It reduces the search space and enhances overall performance. Comprehensive experiments demonstrated that RetroSiG achieved competitive results. Furthermore, we conducted experiments to show the capability of RetroSiG in predicting complex reactions. Ablation experiments verified the efficacy of specific elements, such as the one-hop constraint and the leaving group hypergraph.

Jiajun Zhu, Siqi Miao, Rex Ying et al.

The interpretability of machine learning models has gained increasing attention, particularly in scientific domains where high precision and accountability are crucial. This research focuses on distinguishing between two critical data patterns -- sensitive patterns (model-related) and decisive patterns (task-related) -- which are commonly used as model interpretations but often lead to confusion. Specifically, this study compares the effectiveness of two main streams of interpretation methods: post-hoc methods and self-interpretable methods, in detecting these patterns. Recently, geometric deep learning (GDL) has shown superior predictive performance in various scientific applications, creating an urgent need for principled interpretation methods. Therefore, we conduct our study using several representative GDL applications as case studies. We evaluate thirteen interpretation methods applied to three major GDL backbone models, using four scientific datasets to assess how well these methods identify sensitive and decisive patterns. Our findings indicate that post-hoc methods tend to provide interpretations better aligned with sensitive patterns, whereas certain self-interpretable methods exhibit strong and stable performance in detecting decisive patterns. Additionally, our study offers valuable insights into improving the reliability of these interpretation methods. For example, ensembling post-hoc interpretations from multiple models trained on the same task can effectively uncover the task's decisive patterns.