Stephen Neuendorffer

Emily Tucker, Louis-Noël Pouchet, Erika Hunhoff et al.

Optimizing compilers have become a cornerstone for high-performance program generation in research and industry. Optimizations, including those implemented manually by a user and those target-specific and non-target-specific, are used to transform programs to achieve good performance. Although these optimizations are necessary for performance, assessing their correctness has remained a major challenge; the risk of incorrect code being deployed increases with unproven optimization flows. In this work, we target the formal verification of correctness of a transformed program by computing whether a pair of programs are semantically equivalent, one being a transformed version of the other. We restrict the class of programs supported to enable a hybrid concrete-symbolic interpretation approach to equivalence, which in turn is mostly agnostic to how the programs are implemented (syntax, schedule, storage, etc.). This approach can show equivalence in linear time with respect to the operations executed by the programs. We develop a verifier for a meaningful subset of MLIR, and report on the verification of the AMD MLIR-AIR and MLIR-AIE toolchains, as well as the standard mlir-opt on hundreds of benchmarks variants.

Sangeeta Chowdhary, Ryan Swann, Sean Siddens et al.

Modern GPUs adopt chiplet-based designs with multiple private cache hierarchies, but current programming models (CUDA/HIP) expose a flat execution hierarchy that cannot express chiplet-level locality or synchronization. This mismatch leads to redundant memory traffic and poor cache utilization in memory-bound workloads such as LLM inference. We present Fleet, a multi-level task model that maps computation to memory scopes. Fleet introduces Chiplet-tasks, a new abstraction that binds work and data to a chiplet and enables coordination through its shared L2 cache. Wavefront-level, CU-level, and device-level tasks align with existing abstractions, while Chiplet-tasks expose a previously unaddressed level of the hierarchy. Fleet is implemented as a persistent kernel runtime with per-chiplet scheduling, allowing workers within a chiplet to cooperatively execute tasks with coordinated cache reuse. On AMD Instinct MI350 with Qwen3-8B, Fleet achieves 1.3-1.5x lower decode latency than vLLM at batch sizes 1-8 through persistent kernel execution and per-chiplet scheduling. At larger batch sizes, cooperative weight tiling increases L2 hit rate (from 12% to 54% at batch size 32 and from 39% to 61% at batch size 64), reducing HBM traffic by up to 37% and delivering 1.27-1.30x speedup over a chiplet-unaware megakernel baseline.

Erwei Wang, Samuel Bayliss, Andra Bisca et al.

General-purpose compilers abstract away parallelism, locality, and synchronization, limiting their effectiveness on modern spatial architectures. As modern computing architectures increasingly rely on fine-grained control over data movement, execution order, and compute placement for performance, compiler infrastructure must provide explicit mechanisms for orchestrating compute and data to fully exploit such architectures. We introduce MLIR-AIR, a novel, open-source compiler stack built on MLIR that bridges the semantic gap between high-level workloads and fine-grained spatial architectures such as AMD's NPUs. MLIR-AIR defines the AIR dialect, which provides structured representations for asynchronous and hierarchical operations across compute and memory resources. AIR primitives allow the compiler to orchestrate spatial scheduling, distribute computation across hardware regions, and overlap communication with computation without relying on ad hoc runtime coordination or manual scheduling. We demonstrate MLIR-AIR's capabilities through two case studies: matrix multiplication and the multi-head attention block from the LLaMA 2 model. For matrix multiplication, MLIR-AIR achieves up to 78.7% compute efficiency and generates implementations with performance almost identical to state-of-the-art, hand-optimized matrix multiplication written using the lower-level, close-to-metal MLIR-AIE framework. For multi-head attention, we demonstrate that the AIR interface supports fused implementations using approximately 150 lines of code, enabling tractable expression of complex workloads with efficient mapping to spatial hardware. MLIR-AIR transforms high-level structured control flow into spatial programs that efficiently utilize the compute fabric and memory hierarchy of an NPU, leveraging asynchronous execution, tiling, and communication overlap through compiler-managed scheduling.

Zhijing Li, Yuwei Ye, Stephen Neuendorffer et al.

As customized accelerator design has become increasingly popular to keep up with the demand for high performance computing, it poses challenges for modern simulator design to adapt to such a large variety of accelerators. Existing simulators tend to two extremes: low-level and general approaches, such as RTL simulation, that can model any hardware but require substantial effort and long execution times; and higher-level application-specific models that can be much faster and easier to use but require one-off engineering effort. This work proposes a compiler-driven simulation workflow that can model configurable hardware accelerator. The key idea is to separate structure representation from simulation by developing an intermediate language that can flexibly represent a wide variety of hardware constructs. We design the Event Queue (EQueue) dialect of MLIR, a dialect that can model arbitrary hardware accelerators with explicit data movement and distributed event-based control; we also implement a generic simulation engine to model EQueue programs with hybrid MLIR dialects representing different abstraction levels. We demonstrate two case studies of EQueue-implemented accelerators: the systolic array of convolution and SIMD processors in a modern FPGA. In the former we show EQueue simulation is as accurate as a state-of-the-art simulator, while offering higher extensibility and lower iteration cost via compiler passes. In the latter we demonstrate our simulation flow can guide designer efficiently improve their design using visualizable simulation outputs.