Chris Kennelly

Eric Christopher, Kevin Crossan, Wolff Dobson et al.

Migrating codebases from one instruction set architecture (ISA) to another is a major engineering challenge. A recent example is the adoption of Arm (in addition to x86) across the major Cloud hyperscalers. Yet, this problem has seen limited attention by the academic community. Most work has focused on static and dynamic binary translation, and the traditional conventional wisdom has been that this is the primary challenge. In this paper, we show that this is no longer the case. Modern ISA migrations can often build on a robust open-source ecosystem, making it possible to recompile all relevant software from scratch. This introduces a new and multifaceted set of challenges, which are different from binary translation. By analyzing a large-scale migration from x86 to Arm at Google, spanning almost 40,000 code commits, we derive a taxonomy of tasks involved in ISA migration. We show how Google automated many of the steps involved, and demonstrate how AI can play a major role in automatically addressing these tasks. We identify tasks that remain challenging and highlight research challenges that warrant further attention.

Jin Xin Ng, Ori Livneh, Richard O'Grady et al.

Modern large multicore systems often run multiple workloads that share CPUs under schedulers such as Linux CFS. To keep CPUs busy, these schedulers load-balance runnable work, causing each workload to execute on many cores. This weakens locality at the microarchitectural level: workloads lose reuse in caches, branch predictors, and prefetchers, and interfere more with one another - especially on chiplet-based systems, where spreading execution across cores also spreads it across LLC boundaries. A natural alternative is strict CPU partitioning, but hard partitions leave capacity idle when workloads do not fully use their reserved CPUs. We present Affinity Tailor, a userspace-guided kernel scheduling system built on a key insight: the kernel can preserve locality for workloads that share CPUs by treating demand-sized, topologically compact CPU sets as affinity hints rather than hard partitions. A userspace controller estimates each workload's CPU demand online and assigns a preferred CPU set sized to that demand, chosen to be as disjoint as possible from other workloads while spanning as few LLC domains as possible. The kernel then uses this set as an affinity hint, steering threads toward those CPUs while still allowing execution elsewhere when needed to preserve utilization. Deployed at Google, Affinity Tailor delivers geometric-mean per-CPU throughput gains of 12% on chiplet-based systems and 3% on non-chiplet systems over Linux CFS. Furthermore, faster execution reduces memory residency, yielding per-GB throughput gains of 3-7%. Our findings suggest that future schedulers should treat spatial locality as a first-class objective, even at the expense of work-conservation.