Yang Yuan

Yuan Yang, Jingcheng Yu, Ye Hu et al.

In this paper, we present LiveMedQA, a question answering system that is optimized for consumer health question. On top of the general QA system pipeline, we introduce several new features that aim to exploit domain-specific knowledge and entity structures for better performance. This includes a question type/focus analyzer based on deep text classification model, a tree-based knowledge graph for answer generation and a complementary structure-aware searcher for answer retrieval. LiveMedQA system is evaluated in the TREC 2017 LiveQA medical subtask, where it received an average score of 0.356 on a 3 point scale. Evaluation results revealed 3 substantial drawbacks in current LiveMedQA system, based on which we provide a detailed discussion and propose a few solutions that constitute the main focus of our subsequent work.

Yuan Yang, Pengtao Xie, Xin Gao et al.

Predicting discharge medications right after a patient being admitted is an important clinical decision, which provides physicians with guidance on what type of medication regimen to plan for and what possible changes on initial medication may occur during an inpatient stay. It also facilitates medication reconciliation process with easy detection of medication discrepancy at discharge time to improve patient safety. However, since the information available upon admission is limited and patients' condition may evolve during an inpatient stay, these predictions could be a difficult decision for physicians to make. In this work, we investigate how to leverage deep learning technologies to assist physicians in predicting discharge medications based on information documented in the admission note. We build a convolutional neural network which takes an admission note as input and predicts the medications placed on the patient at discharge time. Our method is able to distill semantic patterns from unstructured and noisy texts, and is capable of capturing the pharmacological correlations among medications. We evaluate our method on 25K patient visits and compare with 4 strong baselines. Our methods demonstrate a 20% increase in macro-averaged F1 score than the best baseline.